Author Archives: marcia

Traveler’s Diary 1/19/25

Posted on by
Reply

January 19,2025

Greetings.  There is a new energy in all that is going on, and we are to you something of a new energy, but nonetheless, we know you well.  So hearken to out words

There is change in the atmosphere, and that change encompasses the totality of the Universe.  It is not caused by any one thing, one person, one cabal, what have you, but rather the change is part of a general movement n the totality.  You see, as many have predicted, there is a shift to a new dimension, a new element, a new (reality- ?), a movement of the 3d from the 5d.  The shift is being made and has been made by many already, and many are not yet aware that they have done this shifting, moreover they are not aware of their place in the whole thing.  Trying to hold onto the old will not be of benefit to anyone for the old is like a rock, like an anchor that will hold them down in the 3d when they do have the potential to move on

Know this, everyone has to the potential to make the shift, but not everyone will do this.  They cannot for their lives are so rooted in the here and now in the possibilities of this world and in the links and banners they have created in that energy. …

  There is this shift, and the love of one for another can only take them so far for as the planet of free will, their choices are what they are and you cannot change them, nor do you have the right —- yes, the right —- to force them into your way of thinking.  That is not within the realms of what is best for their souls and their development also. 

Yes for what is a choice today for some can in the future be overridden by another choice. As circumstances change, so often do choices and opinions change.  The best to do in these circumstances is to stop within your own power and your own way and let them act out their trajectory.

We see a grey cloud encompassing much of your planet and that is a battle in the skies — perhaps in your weather which would be part of the usual circumstances you are dealing with, and you know, the planet, the goddess, Gaia, can only deal with the evil of those of the cabal to a certain point.  At which time she needs to let them know that ultimately she is in charge. Watch for weather patterns to hit and watch for there is be much unexplained phenomena in the air. 

Things are in a place of falling apart right now, as old systems show their true value and the evil that is being perpetrated on the planet, even on the galaxy, is being torn apart by a wave of light.  The light warriors are on the rise and the dark ones will be torn down.  It is happening; .  Be aware.

With what you eat — stay away from processed foods and eating out at places that cannot guarantee quality. 

DO NOT FALL INTO DESPAIR. 

Trust the light; walk in steps of light and stay connected to the higher good.

Thank you.

Ah, Brave New World

Posted on by

My bad memory: I omitted 2 panels from our New World Order graphic

David Schonbrunn took my list of issues and organized them in the most useful way, making what is being done to us and what must be fixed, so much clearer

MERYL NASS
JAN 20, 2025

Thank you, David! Let’s use this scorecard as a measure of success (and what else needs to be accomplished) as we turn all these anti-human policies around, say Goodbye to Globalism and Hello to Individual Liberties and the Rule of Law.

from:    https://merylnass.substack.com/p/my-bad-memory-i-omitted-2-panels?publication_id=746368&post_id=155303528&isFreemail=true&r=19iztd&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Virus Shedding and The effects

Posted on by

What We’ve Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data

Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner

A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR
JAN 19, 2025

Story at a Glance:

•After the COVID-19 vaccines hit the market, stories began emerging of unvaccinated individuals becoming ill after being in proximity to recently vaccinated individuals. This confused many, as the mRNA technology in theory should not be able to “shed.”

•After seeing countless patient cases which can only be explained by COVID vaccine shedding, a year ago, I initiated multiple widely seen calls for individuals to share suspected shedding experiences.

•From those 1,500 reports, clear and replicable patterns have emerged which collectively prove “shedding” is a real and predictable phenomenon that can be explained by known mechanisms unique to the mRNA technology.

•Likewise, after being blocked from publication for over a year, recently, a scientific study corroborating the shedding phenomenon was finally published.

•This article will map out everything that is known about shedding (e.g., what are the common symptoms, how does it happen, who does it affect, does it occur through sexual contact, can it cause severe issues like cancer) along with strategies for preventing it.

When doctors in this movement speak at events about vaccines, by far the most common question they receive is, “Is vaccine shedding real?”

This is understandable as COVID-19 vaccine shedding (becoming ill from vaccinated individuals) represents the one way the unvaccinated are also at risk from the vaccines and hence still need to be directly concerned about them.

Simultaneously, it’s a challenging topic as:

•We believe it is critical to not publicly espouse divisive ideas (e.g., “PureBloods” vs. those who were vaccinated) that prevent the public from coming together and helping everyone. The vaccines were marketed on the basis of division (e.g., by encouraging immense discrimination against the unvaccinated), and many unvaccinated individuals thus understandably hold a lot of resentment for how the vaccinated treated them. We do not want to perpetuate anything similar (e.g., discrimination in the other direction).

•We don’t want to create any more unnecessary fear—which is an inevitable consequence of opening up a conversation about shedding.

•In theory, shedding with the mRNA vaccines should be “impossible,” so claiming otherwise puts one on very shaky ground.

Conversely, if shedding is real, we believe it is critical to expose as:

•Those being affected by it are in a horrible situation, particularly if everyone is gaslighting them about it and insisting it’s all in their head.

•It provides one of the strongest arguments to pull the mRNA vaccines from the market and prohibit the widespread deployment of mRNA technologies in the future.

For those reasons, Pierre Kory and I have spent the last year and a half trying to collect as much evidence as possible to map out this phenomenon with the following data sets:

•Dozens of extremely compelling patient histories1,2,3 from Kory and Marsland’s medical practice, including many responding to spike protein treatment.
•My own experience with patients and friends affected by shedding.
• I read large numbers of reports of shedding in (now deleted) online support groups.
•Roughly 1,500 reports from individuals affected by shedding we were able to collect.
•Extensive menstrual data compiled by MyCycleStory.

From that and the hundreds of hours of work that went into it (particularly reviewing and sorting the 1,500 reports), we can state the following with relative certainty:

1. Shedding is very real (e.g., each of those datasets is congruent with the others), and many of the stories of those affected by it are very sad.
2. People’s sensitivity to it dramatically varies.
3. Most of the people who are sensitive to shedding have already figured it out.
4. Mechanistically, shedding is very difficult to explain. However, now that new evidence has emerged, a much stronger case can be made for the mechanisms I initially proposed a year ago.

Note: if you have a shedding experience you would like to share (or wish to read through them), please do so here, where they are compiled.

Shedding Overview:

By far, the most common symptom of shedding is unusual and disrupted menstrual bleeding (which is also the most common COVID vaccine injury). This in turn, was the first thing that alerted me to the inconceivable possibility the vaccines could shed, as I quickly received many similar reports of highly unusual menstrual bleeding, which appeared to be due to exposure to someone who was vaccinated.

After this, the most common symptoms were headaches, flu-like illnesses, nosebleeds, fatigue, rashes, tinnitus, sinus or nasal issues, and shingles. Other less frequent symptoms are also repeatedly seen (e.g., palpitations, herpes outbreaks, and hair loss).

Additionally, many noticed they could immediately tell when they were in the vicinity of a shedder, typically either due to noticing a unique odor or symptoms immediately onsetting.

Generally speaking, the character of shedding symptoms were quite similar to long COVID and vaccine injuries, but typically were more superficial in nature, suggesting the body was reacting to a harmful external pathogenic factor rather than one already deep inside the body. More severe issues (e.g., cancers or heart attacks) also occurred, but these were much rarer than what you saw in the vaccine injured population, again suggesting shedding was primarily an external reaction. Interestingly, most of the (fairly varied) shedding symptoms overlap with the conditions DMSO treats (e.g., strokes), suggesting that DMSO’s key mechanisms of action (e.g., increasing blood flow, eliminating large and small blood clots, being highly anti-inflammatory, and rescuing cells from the cell danger response) are the exact opposite of what shedding does to the body.

Note: in the following sections, each superscript citation links to individual reports I’ve received about the phenomenon. I provided these citations to show how frequent many of these effects were, so that those who’d experienced them could see many others had too, and so that anyone who wants to research this has access to the primary data. The only shedding symptom I avoided comprehensively citing was abnormal menstruation, as so many reports were received, it was not feasible to compile all of them.

Shedding Patterns

In the same manner that there is a fairly high replicability in the symptoms individuals who are affected by shedding experience, there is also a fairly high congruency in the patterns of how they are affected. Specifically:

1. Some individuals are hypersensitive to shedders and can immediately detect when they are in the presence of a shedder or are on their way to developing harmful symptoms.

2. Others are less sensitive, but quickly notice specific characteristic symptoms consistently occur following shedding exposures (e.g., always feeling ill when a vaccinated husband returns from a long trip away, when going to church each week, when singing with their choir, or when taking a crowded route to work).

In some cases, they are able to identify a “super shedder” (amongst a group) who consistently made them ill, and in many cases they can identify the exact shedding incident that made them ill. Likewise, through tracking serial spike protein antibody levels (e.g., for patients undergoing treatment for long Covid or a vaccine injury) we’ve objectively corroborated that shedding exposures repeatedly worsen these patients (providing an explanation for why their symptoms “inexplicably” ebb and flow), that this can be seen objectively in their lab work and that spike protein treatments after shedding exposures clinically improve these patients.

Note: Pierre Kory’s practice has been able to determine that those they suspect are a shedder (e.g., a husband) test positive (through an antibody test) for a high spike protein levels and that eliminating the shedder from the patient’s life or treating the (asymptomatic) shedder with a vaccine injury protocol frequently significantly improves their patient’s recovery. Likewise, readers here have reported significant improvements from avoiding shedders—which sadly in some cases has required the more sensitive individuals to isolate themselves from society.

3. In the majority of cases, the effects of shedding are temporary and go away, but in a subset of people, they can last for months if not years.

4. Recognition of the shedding phenomenon has forced many to significantly change their lives. This included regretfully terminating a long-term romantic relationship, leaving their line of work (e.g., some massage therapists can no longer handle working on vaccinated clients), or only seeing unvaccinated healthcare providers (e.g., numerous people reported getting ill from vaccinated chiropractors or massage therapists, and we now periodically will have patients state they can only see us if we are unvaccinated).

5. The “stronger” the shedding exposure, the more likely shedding is to cause issues, but conversely, for more sensitive patients, “weaker” exposures also will. More substantial exposures include being around someone who was recently vaccinated or boosted (as shedding is strongest initially), being around more shedders, being in a confined space (e.g., a car) with a shedder for a prolonged period, or having close physical contact with a shedder.
Note: given all of this, I thought flying on airlines would be a significant issue, but I have only received two reports from readers where this was the case.

6. There appear to be some unexplained symptoms otherwise healthy patients now experience that are tied to shedding. However, it’s still often very challenging to tease out when shedding is the culprit due to how many variables are involved and the ambiguity of the subject (which is part of why so much detail has gone into this post so each of you can figure out if you are being affected by shedding).

Susceptibility to Shedding

In general, there are three categories of people who are susceptible to shedding (and in many cases these categories overlap).

The first are the sensitive patients (e.g., those who frequently react to chemicals or get injured by pharmaceuticals). For example, near the start of the vaccine rollout (before I was aware that shedding was an issue), I saw this video and genuinely wondered if it was real as many of its claims were quite extraordinary but at the same time, were somewhat in line with what a highly sensitive patient (of whom I know many) would describe.

To read the rest of the article, go to:

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of?publication_id=748806&post_id=154372114&isFreemail=true&r=19iztd&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

AIPAC?

Posted on by

Bernie Sanders: AIPAC Controls Congress, Not Voters

Chris Menahan
InformationLiberation


Senators who privately oppose Israel’s brutal war on Gaza will vote to advance Israel’s interests over the will of their constituents because they know that AIPAC will destroy their political careers if they do otherwise, according to Senator Bernie Sanders.In an interview last month that’s only now going viral, Sanders (D-VA) told Jon Stewart that fear of having one’s political career destroyed by the Israel Lobby is “the root of everything” when it comes to the will of the public not being reflected by our representatives — only to catch himself and walk it back.

 


“I introduced legislation that would stop arms sales to Netanyahu,” Sanders said. “We got 19 votes, which observers thought was very significant.”

“A significant majority of people who consider themselves Democrats agree with us — I got 19 votes, OK?” he continued. “The American people do not believe that we should be supporting a government that is starving children right now as we speak. But if you stand up, you’re going to find that AIPAC and other billionaire-funded Super PACs are going to go to war against you, putting huge amounts of money in a primary in your general election.”

“So it’s not a question of not understanding,” Sanders said. “There are many members of the Senate who will come to you privately and say, my God, what Netanyahu is doing is outrageous. I just can’t vote, because money is going to come and destroy my political career. So you’ve got to get at the root of everything– not of everything — but a key part of this whole discussion.”

You were right the first time, Bernie. Every member of Congress having an “AIPAC babysitter” is the issue and the fact most of “our” representatives put the interests of a foreign power over America is criminal and that is at the “root” of everything.

 


As Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) said in 2023, AIPAC should not have “the right” to “interfere in an American election on behalf of a foreign country.”

 


Massie is the only one with the balls to say this and that’s why the Israel Lobby is dumping money into smearing him and having their paid assets attack him all day.

Stop beating around the bush, stop equivocating, stop blaming this all on “Netanyahu” and tell the American people the truth!

 

from:    https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64805

 

 

 

Keeping the Zionists Happy

Posted on by

Is the TikTok Ban about China — Or Is It Really About Gaza?

January 17, 2025 Daily Forward, Tehran Times and Candace Owens 5

Politicians claim that they want to ban TikTok because it is a Chinese company that may manipulate or gather data on American users, but the law undercuts the free speech of the 170 million Americans who use it.

The Jewish Daily Forward reported that the government authorities leading the charge against TikTok, like Marco Rubio, Mike Gallagher and Mitt Romney, have stated that anti-Israel videos are a reason to ban TikTok. The Forward revealed that TikTok users were still seeing the pro-Israel videos proportionately more, indicating, if any bias, one toward pro-Israel content.

Candace Owens said that TikTok is being banned on behalf of Israel that controls the US government through aggressive lobbying.

Jonathan Greenblatt, the head of the ADL, was featured in a leaked phone call about criticism of Israel and was recorded saying, “we have a major, major, major generational problem.” He added, “…we really have a TikTok problem, the Gen Z problem.”

.In November 2023, Jonathan Greenblatt, the head of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL), was featured in a leaked phone call about Israel’s war on Gaza and was recorded saying, “we have a major, major, major generational problem.” Greenblatt added, “…and so we really have a TikTok problem, the Gen Z problem.” He urged directing energy toward the younger generation and said, “the useful idiots in the West are falling in line in ways that are terrifying.”

Greenblatt’s leaked phone call:

Link for video

https://www.bitchute.com/video/SzsQVWJo6PhK

Candace showed a clip of Amihay Chikli, the Minister for Diaspora Affairs and Combating Anti-Semitism, boasting that they were able to curb Americans’ free speech on college campuses and on TikTok.

Link for video

Is the TikTok ban about China — or is it really about Gaza?

The Supreme Court is set to rule this week on whether or not to ban TikTok, the short-form video app. Those promoting the ban say it poses a national security threat and could allow the Chinese government to mine Americans’ data; ByteDance, which owns the app, is a Chinese company.

But many users on the platform think that’s a coverup. The real reason to ban TikTok, they say, is to suppress news about Gaza.

The consequences of a ban for TikTok users could be far-reaching — entire economic ecosystems have developed and influencers have built livelihoods on the platform. But most importantly, for many TikTokers, the app is their primary source of news. Particularly news they believe more mainstream media sources are hiding.

“Fascist countries ban apps and websites under the guise of threats to national security, when every other country knows it’s about suppressing the free speech of its citizens,” said one popular TikToker in a viral video about the ban, calling the app “the most popular news and media outlet that the government cannot control.”

Since Oct. 7, commentators and Jewish figures such as Sascha Baron Cohen have noted a strong bent toward pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli content on the platform; some lawmakers accused the app of purposefully biasing its algorithm to favor pro-Palestinian content as part of an anti-Israel agenda.

TikTok repeatedly denied endorsing an anti-Israel agenda, meeting with Jewish influencers, celebrities and organizations including the Anti-Defamation League to reassure them that the platform was not biased. The company pointed out that videos with the hashtag #standwithIsrael received more views than those tagged #freepalestine; though there are more of the latter, users were still seeing the pro-Israel videos proportionately more, indicating, if any bias, one toward pro-Israel content.

And analysts pointed out that support for the Palestinian cause, even before Oct. 7, was growing among the younger generations who make up the vast majority of TikTok’s user base —  they argued that the app’s videos supporting Palestinians or criticizing Israel were likely an accurate reflection of the beliefs shared by the majority of users using the platform.

Nevertheless, even as early as fall 2023, largely Republican lawmakers referenced TikTok’s anti-Israel videos as a reason to ban TikTok in the U.S. “TikTok is a tool China uses to spread propaganda to Americans, now it’s being used to downplay Hamas terrorism,” wrote Sen. Marco Rubio on X in November 2023. (Rubio is now under consideration for Secretary of State in the Trump administration.)

Former house representative from Wisconsin, Mike Gallagher, wrote an article arguing that the app was “brainwashing our youth against the country and our allies” with “rampant pro-Hamas propaganda.”

And Mitt Romney drew a direct line between his support for the ban and pro-Palestinian content on TikTok. “Some wonder why there was such overwhelming support for us to shut down potentially TikTok or other entities of that nature,” he said at a forum in May, going on to allege that “the number of mentions of Palestinians” is far higher on TikTok “relative to other social media sites.”

But that’s not true; nearly every social media platform tilted toward “Free Palestine” content in the wake of Oct. 7. A study from The Washington Post in November 2023 found a similar proportion of pro-Palestine posts on Facebook and Instagram, yet no one is trying to ban Meta.

All of this means: It makes sense that TikTokers feel as though the ban on their favorite app is an attempt to limit their free speech about Palestine, and prevent criticism of Israel, all in an attempt to influence American thinking away from supporting Palestinians and toward supporting Israel. After all, the governmental figures leading the charge against the platform have said as much.

Read full article here…

from:    https://needtoknow.news/2025/01/is-the-tiktok-ban-about-china-or-is-it-really-about-gaza/

 

It’s TImeTo Make the Federal Reserve Accountable

Posted on by

Representative Thomas Massie Introduces Legislation to Audit the Federal Reserve

January 17, 2025 New American, Thomas Massie and G. Edward Griffin 17

G. Edward Griffin, author of The Creature from Jekyll Island; A Second Look at the Federal Reserve, has responded by saying: “I enthusiastically support this bill because it could bring to light so many unconstitutional activities that we instinctively know are commonplace at the Fed but cannot prove. But I am concerned that the government may do what it usually does in such cases, which is that it investigates itself, takes so long to do so that the public eventually loses interest, eventually it publishes a 2,000 page book of meaningless minutia, and concludes that, aside from a few minor infractions of the law by low-level personnel, everything is fine.

So, I strongly urge Representative Massie and others with influence over this investigation to ensure that all the appointed members of the investigating committee once again declare allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and can prove that they are familiar with Article One that defines the limitations on the issuance of money. Another wise provision would be to require that no more than 50% of the appointees may be dependent on government funding as their primary livelihood income. Furthermore, all actions, documents, and substantive conversations between investigators and/or witnesses should be recorded and, within 24 hours of occurrence, published online for public access. There should be a hard deadline of no more than four months to produce and publish the unredacted findings of the committee. To make this meaningful, it also should include the clear statement that there can be no exceptions to this rule including the claim of national security, for the simple reason that full transparency in matters of this magnitude is essential for national security.

Many politicians will most likely not be willing to endorse such a proposal, but they are the same ones who will do nothing to seriously challenge the Federal Reserve power regardless of the disclosures of the committee. They are talkers, not doers. Their mission is to give us hope, but they will betray us eventually when they fail to support meaningful change. So, let’s not play political games any longer. Investigate, yes, But then eliminate! That’s our goal, and time to do so is running out!”

Summary by JW Williams from excerpts taken from JBS New American and Thomas Massie

Congressman Thomas Massie reintroduced H.R. 24, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2025, also known as “Audit the Fed.” The bill would require the Comptroller General to conduct a full examination of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Reserve Banks.

The American public deserves more insight into the practices of the Federal Reserve,” Rep. Massie said. “Behind closed doors, the Fed crafts monetary policies that devalue our currency, slow economic growth, and make life harder for the poor and middle class. The American people benefit when we work to increase government transparency.”

H.R. 24, titled the “Federal Reserve Transparency Act,” is cosponsored by 41 other representatives.

In a 2023 interview, Congressman Massie pointed out that if the Federal Reserve were audited, and its secret activities were revealed, it would likely be abolished.

In May 2024, Massie issued this press release that explains that the Federal Reserve is to blame for inflation:

“Americans are suffering under crippling inflation, and the Federal Reserve is to blame. During COVID, the Federal Reserve created trillions of dollars out of thin air and loaned it to the Treasury Department to enable unprecedented deficit spending. By monetizing the debt, the Federal Reserve devalued the dollar and enabled free money policies that caused the high inflation we see today.

Monetizing debt is a closely coordinated effort between the White House, Federal Reserve, Treasury Department, Congress, Big Banks, and Wall Street. Through this process, retirees see their savings evaporate due to the actions of a central bank pursuing inflationary policies that benefit the wealthy and connected. If we really want to reduce inflation, the most effective policy is to end the Federal Reserve.”

There was, in fact, a partial audit of the Federal Reserve in 2010, that revealed that the Fed gave over $16 trillion in secret bank bailouts during the Great Recession.

The Federal Reserve’s creation in 1913 remains one of the most egregious violations of the US Constitution. In addition to blatantly violating the Constitution by its very existence, the Fed has the ability to single-handedly manipulate the economy and devalue the US dollar.

A sound monetary policy is necessary for a nation’s economy to be stable and enable material prosperity. Already, the Federal Reserve and the Deep State have caused far too much damage through their inflation of the U.S. dollar and issuance of fiat currency. It is imperative that Congress follow the Constitution and put an end to this.

Contact your U.S. representative and senators and urge them to support this important bill.

Sources:

The New American 

Thomas Massie press release

HR 24 legislation

from:    https://needtoknow.news/2025/01/representative-thomas-massie-introduces-legislation-to-audit-the-federal-reserve/

What About The Other Red Dyes, Blue Dyes, etc. (Tokenism)

Posted on by

FDA Bans Red Dye No. 3 But Leaves Six Other Popular Synthetic Dyes In US Food & Drink Products

January 19, 2025 InfoWars and ABC 1

Red No. 3 is a coloring derived from petroleum that has been banned in cosmetics since 1990, but approved for human consumption up until a few days ago. Red 40 is actually consumed the most per pound among three major food dyes included in over 36,000 US food products and has been linked to hyperactivity in children, allergic reactions, negative behavioral effects, potential carcinogenic effects, and a negative impact on the immune system. These dyes are only a small sample of of harmful products found in American food, drinks and pharmaceuticals ingested by millions each day.

.

The outgoing Biden administration’s FDA announced earlier this week it will be banning Red Dye No. 3 from being used in thousands of food, drink and pharmaceutical products throughout the United States.

Red No. 3 is a coloring derived from petroleum that has been banned in cosmetics since 1990, but approved for human consumption up until a few days ago.

While the decision was widely celebrated as a health victory, it sadly falls short of addressing the larger issue of synthetic dyes in American products.

According to the Department of Agriculture, Red 40 is actually consumed the most per pound among three major food dyes included in over 36,000 U.S. food products.

Red Dye 40 is found in significantly more food products than Red Dye 3.

The number 40 red dye has been linked to hyperactivity in children, allergic reactions, negative behavioral effects, potential carcinogenic effects, and a negative impact on the immune system.

With the incoming Donald Trump administration focusing on improving America’s health and ridding the food supply of unhealthy products under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., it’s possible the other major synthetic dyes consumed by the masses could be removed from products.

For example, Yahoo Life reports “The California School Food Safety Act, which is a follow-up to the California Food Safety Act and focuses on foods served in schools, will ban red dye No. 40, yellow dyes Nos. 5 and 6, blue dyes Nos. 1 and 2 and green dye No. 3 from being sold in California schools effective Dec. 31, 2027.”

It’s very possible the Kennedy-led HHS could copy this legislation at the federal level.

Yellow dyes Nos. 5 and 6 are also linked to similar health issues as red dye No. 40 with some studies linking No. 5 to cell damage and No. 6 to organ damage and hormonal effects.

The two blue dyes are less commonly linked to negative health concerns compared to other food dyes, but are connected to potential issues such as hyperactivity and allergic reactions.

Read full article here…

from:    https://needtoknow.news/2025/01/fda-bans-red-dye-no-3-but-leaves-six-other-popular-synthetic-dyes-in-us-food-drink-products/

The Travelers’ Diary October 30, 2024

Posted on by

We have been waiting… “in the wings” as you tend to say, and while sometimes that is well for observation, at other times it means that messages that might rightly have come out earlier are left behind, but we know how you humans work, and that not paying attention is often a skill that you have honed much more than we.

Ah, well, but here we are now, and the s is not to reprimand or to remind, rather a comment that sometimes we like to give.

And now is now, so here we have to say that things are indeed rocky and to become rockier so it is well not to open any conversation that could lead to any sort of potential conflict, not that you would mean it that way but so many have become mind controlled that they tend to twist and mold comments into controversy for the very joy of feeling that they are right and that others are not.

It is not an easy time for conversation, but it is an excellent time fo observation.

Watch what is going on (not listen, you know we are saying) to what people are saying for there is a message oftentimes in their movements which will tell you what they mean to say or how they are feeling, and so many are feeling dispossessed, uncared for, unloved, and they feel that there is a possibility (that) something in this cycle will fulfill those needs.  Ah, how misinformed they are,  but it just shows you how pervasive the media is.

And there is much in the way of fraud that is being perpetrated and explored and experimented on the people in general.  The very air holds the … (not sure of the word used here) of these messages, and as a result, and interestingly, because of this things will be …  (not sure of word) more fair shall we say in this election then in the lsat one when there were crimes committed that have yet to be rectified and even acknowledged publicly although people are aware that there was much wrong with what happened.

It is well for those of good will to hold to the light and to be strong in the midst of this current.

Interestingly any of the steered “natural’ events will help many undecided to make up their mind and to see that there is much being done the is against the goodness of human nature and that this control is moving towards a precipitous fall.  And soon.

There is much to come out, and things can no longer be hidden nor will they be.

Prepare for some revelations in the coming days.  Many can shake things up wildly, and it is well for those who work for the light not to become swayed by the currents of evil that are floating around.  Nor is it necessary to respond to them for they will show their true colors, as you say, within the next few days, as the wave of revelation and realization flows over your country

Be swell stay strong, pray and walk in the light.

We go

Kamala Links – MK Ultra? Not Black?

Posted on by

Candace Owens Interviews Man Who Links Kamala Harris’ Mother to MK Ultra Mind Control

October 29, 2024 Candace Owens 2

Last week, Candace Owens revealed that Kamala Harris has Sephardic Jewish ancestry traced back to her father’s father that is being blocked. Candace speculated that Kamala is trying to “blackify” herself to win the black vote.

Candace interviewed Mr. Yoichi Clark Shimatsu, who was a journalism graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley when he knew Kamala Harris’ mother, Shyamala Gopalan. He made bold statements about Shyamala, including that she revived MK Ultra government mind control experiments in Canada at a Jewish hospital. He said that MK Ultra originated in London at the Tavistock Institute and Sigmund Freud’s son was made the director of the operation. The MK Ultra program was later moved to Canada and was also practiced in the US. He provided insight into Kamala’s childhood with her mother who was said to be ‘militant’ and may have influenced Kamala’s curios speech patterns and behavior.

Mr. Clark Shimatsu said that when Kamala Harris was the San Francisco District Attorney, she prosecuted black juvenile delinquents for low level drug crimes, but ignored the Jewish drug cartels that supplied the drugs and was engaged in money laundering.

Mr. Clark Shimatsu linked Kamala’s running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz with counterfeit US dollars floating in the southwestern states of the US due to Kamala’s open border, as the phony bills are allied with the Mexican cartels.

Explosive video interview with Mr. Yoichi Clark Shimatsu about Kamala Harris’ mother and more…

Link for video

 

  • Save

Link for video

from:    https://needtoknow.news/2024/10/candace-owens-interviews-man-who-links-kamala-harris-mother-to-mk-ultra-mind-control/

New Role for the Military?

Posted on by

DOD challenges Posse Comitatus doctrine: issues directive saying the US military can kill Americans on US soil

WHAT?!!

MERYL NAss

https://x.com/Holden_Culotta/status/1845935989333659721

Why the Posse Comitatus Act Must Be Reformed

Significant exceptions and loopholes, along with a lack of enforcement mechanisms, undermine the law that prevents military involvement in law enforcement.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/why-posse-comitatus-act-must-be-reformed

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 was enacted to keep the U.S. military out of civilian law enforcement except where authorized by Congress. While it is meant to prevent federal troops from being used against Americans, gaping loopholes and exceptions threaten to swallow the rule. Brennan Center counsel Joseph Nunn discusses his new report covering the reforms needed to strengthen this crucial guardrail.

What is the origin of the phrase posse comitatus, and how does that relate to the purpose of the Posse Comitatus Act?

That is actually a fun fact. Posse comitatus is Latin for “the power of the county.” It refers to the authority that sheriffs and some other law enforcement officials had at common law to gather a group of citizens to pursue lawbreakers. In Britain and the United States, before the modern era, the sheriff was often the only local law enforcement officer, and any significant lawbreaking would be more than he could handle alone. The posse comitatus power allowed him to call in reinforcements. To connect this to popular culture, in a Western film, when the sheriff gathers a “posse” of townsfolk to chase outlaws, that’s a posse comitatus.

The Posse Comitatus Act is so named because it prohibits the use of federal armed forces as a posse comitatus or to otherwise enforce the law unless doing so is expressly authorized by Congress.

What is the main issue with the Posse Comitatus Act as it’s written now?

It’s too weak. The Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program is often concerned with statutes that are dangerous because they grant too much authority or they’re too broad. The Posse Comitatus Act, however, is dangerous because it doesn’t go far enough: it’s too flimsy a guardrail. On paper, the law limits federal military participation in law enforcement, but it is undermined by an overabundance of exceptions, significant loopholes, and the lack of an effective enforcement mechanism.

As a result, the principle enshrined in the Posse Comitatus Act is protected more by norms and historical practice than by the text of the law itself. Unfortunately, we’ve entered an era in which we can no longer rely on tradition to constrain executive action.

What exceptions and loopholes in the Posse Comitatus Act concern you the most?

When thinking about weak points in the Posse Comitatus Act, the Insurrection Act is the 800-pound gorilla in the room. This law grants the president incredibly broad authority to deploy the military domestically, under circumstances that aren’t clearly defined. The Brennan Center has written extensively about the dangers of the Insurrection Act and proposed reforms, so our new report focuses on the lesser-known loopholes.

One significant loophole is the District of Columbia National Guard. While all other National Guards are commanded by their state or territorial governors, the DC Guard falls under the president’s direct control at all times. Although it can act as a federal force, the Department of Justice has long claimed it can also operate as a non-federal “militia” that is not constrained by the Posse Comitatus Act. This means presidents can theoretically use the DC Guard for law enforcement whenever they choose.

Another loophole is Section 502(f) of Title 32 of the U.S. Code, which allows the National Guard to carry out federal missions at the request of the president or secretary of defense while remaining under state control, thus bypassing the Posse Comitatus Act. While the rest of Section 502 is principally used for training missions, there are no criteria limiting what kinds of missions Subsection f can be used for. The Trump administration exploited this license a few years ago when it invited National Guard troops from 11 states into DC to suppress protests following the murder of George Floyd. This unprecedented action was done without invoking the Insurrection Act, as the president could simply ask sympathetic state governors to give the orders on his behalf.

To make matters worse, the Posse Comitatus Act lacks an effective enforcement mechanism. The law is a criminal statute, yet there’s no real threat of prosecution for violating it in practice. No one has ever been convicted for violating the Posse Comitatus Act, and only two people have ever been prosecuted — both more than 140 years ago.

Why is it a problem for the military to act as a domestic police force?

Military participation in law enforcement is sometimes necessary in a true crisis, but it is always risky. One of the most immediate concerns is that soldiers are trained to fight an enemy who lacks constitutional rights; they are not generally trained for domestic law enforcement. For instance, soldiers aren’t necessarily instructed in how to provide due process or conduct searches and arrests appropriately. Asking soldiers to perform these duties raises the risk of infringing on the public’s First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment rights — and it is unfair to the soldiers, who did not enter the military with the goal of policing their fellow citizens.

Beyond those immediate concerns, there’s an American tradition that traces back to the founding of this country rejecting military interference in civilian affairs. The founders were extraordinarily suspicious of military power, and not just when it was used domestically. During the Constitutional Convention, there was significant debate about whether to even allow a national standing army. These debates were motivated by fears that such an army could easily become a tool of tyranny. When an army is turned inward, that danger is particularly acute.

Importantly, though, the Brennan Center’s stance is not that military participation in law enforcement is never appropriate. Rather, it should be confined to emergencies when civilian authorities are truly overwhelmed. The January 6 insurrection is a paradigmatic example of this. Civilian authorities — the Capitol Police — were manifestly overwhelmed. And in that moment, there was a genuine physical threat to Congress. So in that case, deployment of the DC National Guard was entirely appropriate. Indeed, the president rightly came under criticism for delaying deployment of the Guard.

Why is prosecution under this law so rare?

The most straightforward answer is that violations are not very common. Federal forces aren’t deployed domestically very often, and when they are, they are guided by strong norms of compliance — at least historically speaking. Our report aims to highlight the significant risk of abuse and misconduct rather than to identify a clearly established pattern of it.

There are likely other reasons at play too. For instance, one-off infringements by individual soldiers acting without authorization might be considered too minor to justify criminal charges, while there would be little appetite within the Department of Justice to pursue criminal charges against a soldier acting on orders passed down from civilian commanders.

If the law is so problematic, why hasn’t it been reformed before?

There are a few reasons. Chief among them is that this is an area of the law that Congress is extremely reluctant to touch. The Posse Comitatus Act is regarded as sacrosanct. Lawmakers are wary of making changes to such an important guardrail — but that’s why it’s important to show that the guardrail isn’t as solid as they might think.

Another reason is that significant violations of the Posse Comitatus Act are not common, as I mentioned before, in part because the military takes compliance very seriously. This stems, I believe, from a commitment to the principle enshrined in the law, as well as the more practical reason that the military does not like to do domestic law enforcement. From their perspective, it’s not their job. They understand it’s not something they’re principally trained for, it is a distraction from what they regard as their core focuses, and it is unpopular with both soldiers and the public.

The small number of violations can also be chalked up to the United States being very lucky so far. Presidents have generally acted with restraint when it comes to domestic use of the military, but there’s no reason to assume that will remain true. Luck is no substitute for robust legal safeguards.

What are the main reforms you’re advocating for?

There are several important reforms outlined in the report, but I’ll mention four particularly important ones here. First and foremost, reform the Insurrection Act. There must be clear standards for when and how presidents can use the law, as well as meaningful checks by the other branches of government.

Second, close the DC National Guard loophole by either transferring control over the DC Guard to the mayor of Washington or extending the Posse Comitatus Act to cover the DC Guard at all times.

Third, close the Section 502(f) loophole. The Posse Comitatus Act should be extended to cover National Guard deployments when the Guard performs a federal mission at the request of the president or the secretary of defense.

Fourth, create more effective enforcement mechanisms. Congress should impose an exclusionary rule that prevents evidence obtained in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act from being used in court. Congress should also consider allowing individuals harmed by violations of the Posse Comitatus Act to sue for civil damages. The risk of having crucial evidence thrown out and the potential for lawsuits by injured citizens will provide far stronger incentives for both the military and their civilian leadership to comply with the law than the nonexistent prospect of criminal prosecution.

What are the prospects for reforming the Posse Comitatus Act?

There is a bipartisan understanding in Congress that some degree of domestic deployment reform is necessary, particularly regarding the Insurrection Act. Additionally, there is some support for broader reforms aimed at the National Guard and the Posse Comitatus Act. That said, advancing these reforms will take time and require a good deal of discussion about why they matter, as this area of law is not tremendously well understood. Our hope is that this report can help to move this process forward.

from:    https://merylnass.substack.com/p/dod-challenges-posse-comitatus-doctrine?publication_id=746368&post_id=150319881&isFreemail=true&r=19iztd&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email