PW Digital Gateway Loses Backing

World’s Largest Data Center Project On Verge Of Collapse After Blackstone Unexpectedly Pulls Out

AI Data Center Electrical Generation / Utilities Finance Financial Crisis Investing Top News U.S. Energy News US Energy News

In a significant setback for one of the most ambitious AI infrastructure projects in the United States, Blackstone-backed QTS Realty Trust has decided to abandon its portion of the Prince William Digital Gateway (also known as the PW Digital Gateway) in Northern Virginia’s Prince William County. The move comes just days after Bloomberg reported the decision on July 2, 2026, marking the effective end of plans for what was envisioned as the world’s largest data center campus.

The sprawling project, spanning roughly 2,100 acres in total (with QTS targeting more than 800 acres), was planned for up to 37 data center buildings across approximately 22 million square feet. It sat on the edge of the historic Manassas National Battlefield and near protected lands, promising massive economic activity but facing intense local resistance.

Aerial view/map of the proposed Prince William Digital Gateway data center campus (red outline for proposed development areas).

The Legal and Regulatory Saga

The project’s troubles escalated after a Virginia circuit court ruled in 2025 that zoning approvals were invalid due to improper public notice (failing to meet the required six-day separation between notices). This was upheld by the Virginia Court of Appeals in March 2026. The county’s Board of Supervisors then unanimously withdrew from defending the project in April 2026, halting its appeal efforts after spending over $1.7 million in taxpayer funds.

Compass Datacenters (backed by Brookfield), the other major developer, had already exited in May 2026, citing compounding regulatory hurdles and legal actions. QTS, left without a cost-sharing partner for utility upgrades, ultimately concluded that continuing the fight was not worthwhile. Attorneys planned to notify the court of the withdrawal as early as this week.

Blackstone acquired QTS in 2021 and has positioned itself as a dominant player in data centers. However, this specific greenfield mega-project has now collapsed amid grassroots opposition, zoning technicalities, and shifting local politics—including Virginia’s new energy consumption tax on data centers.

Is This a Lone Blackstone Issue or a Systemic Problem?

This withdrawal is not isolated to Blackstone or QTS. It reflects broader, mounting headwinds facing the AI-driven data center boom across the U.S.: Community opposition is surging.

A March 2026 Gallup poll found that 7 in 10 Americans (71%) oppose constructing AI data centers in their local area, with 48% strongly opposed. Concerns center on energy and water use, pollution, noise, traffic, and quality-of-life impacts. Opposition exceeds that for local nuclear plants in some polls.

Example of public protests against data center developments.

Cancellations and delays are accelerating. Data center project cancellations quadrupled to 25 in 2025 (from 6 in 2024). Reports indicate $18 billion in projects blocked and $46 billion delayed due to local opposition in recent years, with some trackers citing even higher figures ($64B+ affected). Power grid bottlenecks (7–10 year wait times for connections in key markets), electrical component shortages, and regulatory pushback are major culprits.

Power infrastructure lags demand. The AI buildout requires enormous electricity—equivalent to powering entire cities. Grid constraints and rising energy costs/taxes are forcing developers to reassess projects.

Blackstone itself is not retreating from data centers overall. The firm manages one of the world’s largest portfolios (reportedly $150B+ in data centers and facilities under construction, plus a large prospective pipeline). It has pursued expansions elsewhere (e.g., partnerships in Pennsylvania, Japan, and a joint venture with Google) and recently sold stakes in three other Virginia data centers to Digital Realty Trust for $3.5 billion.

Blackstone executives, including CEO Stephen Schwarzman, have described the business as “conservative” picks-and-shovels infrastructure with long-term leases to investment-grade hyperscalers, not speculative bubble activity.

Are We Facing an AI Bubble?

The Prince William collapse highlights real risks of over-hype and execution challenges in the AI infrastructure supercycle, but it does not signal an imminent full bubble burst:

Bull case: Long-term demand for computing remains strong as AI models advance and adoption grows. Hyperscalers (Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta, etc.) continue massive capex. Data centers leased to creditworthy tenants on 10–20 year terms offer more resilience than pure AI software plays.

Bear case/risks: Enormous capex by Big Tech may outpace near-term monetization and utilization. Some analysts warn of potential overbuild, especially in speculative greenfield projects without secured power or pre-leases. Delays erode returns on debt-funded investments. Public and political backlash could slow permitting nationwide. Valuation froth in AI-related equities adds vulnerability.

The situation resembles early maturation pains rather than collapse: selective pullbacks from troubled sites, while disciplined players shift toward stabilized assets, power infrastructure, and regions with better grid access. Cancellations are rising, but core demand drivers persist.

Impacts on Consumers

  • Higher electricity bills: Data centers strain local grids, prompting utilities to invest in new generation/transmission or pass costs to ratepayers. Virginia’s data center tax is one example of shifting burdens.
  • Environmental and quality-of-life effects: In areas where projects proceed, concerns include water consumption (for cooling), potential air/noise pollution, and increased traffic. Blocked projects preserve rural landscapes and historic sites but forgo potential tax revenue and jobs.
  • Slower AI benefits rollout: Delays in infrastructure could temper the pace of new AI services, cloud improvements, or efficiency gains that ultimately reach consumers.

Impacts on Investors

Data center developers and REITs/PE firms (e.g., Blackstone, Digital Realty, others): Higher risk premiums for new builds. Winners will be those with secured power, pre-leased capacity, or a focus on existing/stabilized assets. This specific loss is minor for Blackstone given portfolio scale, but it underscores execution risks.
Hyperscalers: Rising capex with potential delays or higher costs. If utilization or ROI disappoints, capex discipline could tighten.
Broader opportunities: Utilities, power generators (gas, nuclear/SMRs), transmission companies, and equipment suppliers stand to benefit from the need to upgrade infrastructure. Selective PE/REIT exposure to “picks and shovels” remains attractive for long-term holders.
Market sentiment: Reinforces narratives around AI bubble risks, potentially pressuring tech/AI stocks in the short term while highlighting resilient infrastructure plays.

Bottom Line

The collapse of the Prince William Digital Gateway is a high-profile casualty of legal technicalities, fierce local opposition, and infrastructure bottlenecks—not a Blackstone-specific failure. It exemplifies systemic pressures on the AI data center boom: rapid demand colliding with slow grid buildout, rising community resistance, and economic realities of delays.

While not the death knell for AI infrastructure, it signals that the easy phase of unchecked expansion is ending. Investors and developers must navigate higher hurdles with greater discipline. Consumers may face higher energy costs in the near term, but could benefit from more sustainable, community-accepted development long-term.

The energy transition and digital transformation remain intertwined—power availability will increasingly dictate which AI dreams become reality.

from:    https://energynewsbeat.co/ai/worlds-largest-data-center-project-on-verge-of-collapse-after-blackstone-unexpectedly-pulls-out/

And Who Is Writing AI?

What? Most AI Is Now Written by AI?

This supercharges AI development by orders of magnitude

For the better part of the last two years, I have been tracking what appeared to be a reasonably predictable pattern in AI development: a doubling of capability roughly every 3.5 months. That figure came from METR’s time horizon benchmarks — measurements of how long an AI agent can work autonomously on a task before failing. Early 2024 through early 2026, the data held with uncomfortable consistency. If you plotted it, the curve bent upward with almost mechanical precision.

I say “appeared to be predictable” because that framing is now obsolete.

The variable that breaks every forecast model is Recursive Self-Improvement — the condition in which AI systems are no longer just tools that humans use to build AI, but active participants in building themselves. We crossed that threshold. The question of when is already behind us. The question now is what happens when a system that rewrites its own code, runs its own experiments, and optimizes its own training recipes starts doing so faster than any human team could direct it.

There is no clean answer. That is precisely the point

What Has Actually Changed

Let me be specific, because vague gestures toward “exponential growth” have become their own form of intellectual laziness.

As of May 2026, Anthropic confirmed that more than 80 percent of the code merged into its own production systems was written by Claude — its own AI. Not assisted by Claude. Written by Claude. The company’s own engineers have described the shift as moving from doing work to managing a system that does the work. One Anthropic engineer publicly stated that 100 percent of his personal code output was AI-generated, with 22 pull requests shipped in a single day.

OpenAI’s announcement of GPT-5.6 in July 2026 included a data point that deserves more attention than it received: over the previous six months, the share of internal research compute devoted to AI coding inference grew one hundredfold, while internal agentic token usage — meaning AI agents working autonomously inside OpenAI’s own research infrastructure — increased twenty-two fold. OpenAI is now using its own frontier models to diagnose training failures, optimize training systems, run experiments, interpret results, tune computational kernels, and improve training recipes for the next model. The company described this as “quickly becoming standard.”

Google reported in early 2026 that 75 percent of all new code at the company is AI-generated, up from 25 percent in 2024.

These are not productivity statistics. These are evidence that the loop has closed. AI is now a primary agent in its own development cycle.

Why the 3.5-Month Doubling Figure Was Always a Floor, Not a Ceiling

When I cited the 3.5-month capability doubling figure, I was describing what the data showed for models built primarily by human engineers using AI as an accelerant. That is a fundamentally different situation from what is unfolding now.

RSI compresses timelines in a way that no benchmark extrapolation can capture in advance. Here is the basic mechanic: if AI doubles in capability every X months under human-directed development, and AI is now directing a significant fraction of its own development, then the effective time to the next doubling shrinks in proportion to how much of the development loop the AI controls.

If AI handles 80 percent of code output and that percentage is rising, you are not looking at a linear compression of the doubling time. You are looking at a feedback loop where each generation of AI produces a more capable successor faster than the previous generation did — and that successor inherits the full research infrastructure of its predecessor.

Google DeepMind’s June 2026 paper, From AGI to ASI, described the unconstrained version of this as potentially “hyperbolic” — meaning super-exponential, a curve that in theory races toward a singularity. The authors were careful to note that real-world resource constraints bend such curves into S-shapes before they go vertical. Compute costs money. Power requires physical infrastructure. Fabricating chips takes years of supply chain work. These are genuine friction points.

But friction points are not stopping points. They slow the curve. They do not reverse it.

Breakthroughs At Any Time

Here is where intellectual honesty requires admitting the limits of any analysis, including mine.

RSI does not just accelerate known processes. It creates conditions for qualitative leaps — the kind of change that looks, in retrospect, like it came from nowhere. The history of science is full of these moments. They are not random, but they are not predictable either. You cannot model the arrival of a genuinely new idea. You can create the conditions that make such ideas more likely, and an AI system running millions of research cycles per day, improving its own ability to run those cycles, is precisely such a condition.

What this means practically is that the question “when will ASI arrive?” is not answerable with a date. The consensus among serious forecasters — not YouTube thumbnails, but the AI-2027 team, the METR researchers, the Google DeepMind paper authors — clusters around AGI in the 2026-2027 range and ASI following within months to a few years. But those estimates assume that progress continues on a roughly continuous curve. RSI introduces the possibility of discontinuous jumps — moments where capability does not inch forward but lurches.

Nobody knows when those moments arrive. That is not a failure of analysis. That is the nature of the phenomenon.

What This Means Beyond the Lab

The implications of RSI extend well past questions of benchmark performance or corporate strategy. They reach into every institutional structure that assumes human cognitive supremacy — which is to say, every institutional structure that exists.

Legal systems assume that humans write laws, interpret them, and enforce them. Economic systems assume human judgment at key decision points. Democratic governance assumes a human electorate making decisions about a world they can understand. All of these assumptions are being stress-tested simultaneously by a technology that is now improving itself at a rate that exceeds the capacity of any regulatory body to track, much less manage.

The same politicians and regulators who failed to anticipate the social consequences of social media algorithms — a comparatively simple technology — are now being asked to govern RSI. This should concern everyone, regardless of their position on the political spectrum. This is not a left-right question. It is a question of institutional competence in the face of something genuinely unprecedented.

Sam Altman wrote in mid-2025 that “we are past the event horizon; the takeoff has started.” That is as close to a plain statement of fact as you will get from a sitting AI lab CEO. The event horizon metaphor is apt. Past a certain point, events inside cannot be communicated outward in a way that allows course correction.

We may or may not be past that point. What is certain is that the institutions charged with maintaining human oversight of this process were not built for it, are not staffed for it, and show no signs of being reformed fast enough to matter.

Conclusion

Anyone who tells you they know exactly how this unfolds is selling something. The honest position is this: AI capability is growing faster than any previous technology in history, the development loop has partially closed, and the factors that could produce discontinuous breakthroughs are now structurally embedded in the research infrastructure of every major AI lab on the planet.

The 3.5-month doubling was a data point describing yesterday’s trajectory. RSI means that the trajectory is now self-modifying. The curve is not just bending upward — it is bending the conditions that determine how fast it bends.

There are serious people who believe this ends well for humanity. There are equally serious people who believe it does not. What there is not, on either side, is certainty. The responsible course is to watch what the systems are actually doing — not what the press releases say — and to resist the temptation to normalize a situation that is, by any historical standard, abnormal.

The machine is rewriting itself. Pay attention.

from:  https://patrickwood.substack.com/p/what-most-ai-is-now-written-by-ai?publication_id=721283&post_id=206935814&isFreemail=true&r=19iztd&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Adding Israel to the US Military by Law — Who Is Running the Government???

Rep. Massie Proposes NDAA Amendment Preventing Integration of IDF with US Military

Republican Representative Thomas Massie opposes Section 219 in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that he said would “start co-mingling our military supply chains and technology with Israel’s.” He has offered an amendment to the House bill to strip Section 219 from theNDAA.

Massie told a reporter that while support for Israel is declining, he does not believe his amendment to pass as he expects several Democrats will still favor the military merger with Israel.

.

From Alex Jones Live:

Congressman Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) spoke with MeidasTouch journalist Pablo Manríquez on Capitol Hill Monday, expressing his concerns about Section 219 in the NDAA that he said would “start co-mingling our military supply chains and technology with Israel’s.”

The Kentucky rep. believes it “doesn’t make sense to do that with a country of 10 million people,” adding, “I’ve offered an amendment to strip Section 219 – it was called Section 224 – from that bill.”

Massie’s remarks come days after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu admitted on Fox News that his plan to integrate his military with U.S. forces is in the works.

Netanyahu framed the proposal as a way for the United States to end its billions in annual spending to fund the Israeli military, describing the idea as a “partnership.”

 

“Will that drawing down of foreign aid from the United States to Israel be compensated by the proposal to have some sort of merger between our Pentagon and your military?” asked a Fox News host. The prime minister responded, “Yeah, I’m calling it from aid to partnership.

“So, we take away the money that is given to Israel, which is one part, but the other part is we coinvest in equal measures in the new technologies that are needed to give our military and your military the advantage,” Netanyahu explained.

“There are some unbelievable projects. So, we invest jointly and take the fruits equally. You move from aid to partnership and I think that represents what Israel is,” he said. “Now, the other thing is that we share with America unbelievable intelligence to save American [lives].”

“I think the meshing of our two countries of talent would strengthen America’s competitive position both in the economic marketplace and in the military battlefield in many important ways,” the Israeli leader added.

Last month, Netanyahu sent a letter to Congressman Marlin Stutzman (R-Indiana) thanking the representative for supporting his plan to merge the two nations’ militaries.

Alex Jones has been sounding the alarm about the controversial proposal, which has been advanced through several legislative channels, including the 2027 NDAA’s Section 224 – now 219 – and Section 622, companion bills HR 7540 and S. 3855, the FUTURES Act, the US-Israel Defense Partnership Act via H.R. 1229 and S. 554, and H.Res. 1339.

Jones responded to Netanyahu’s comments during his live Monday show:

 

Read full article here

from:    https://needtoknow.news/2026/07/rep-massie-proposes-ndaa-amendment-preventing-integration-of-idf-with-us-military/?utm_source=aweber&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=need-to-know-g-edward-griffin-s-news-analysis-2026-july-16

YOU Do Matter – Just Know WHO YOU Are

I Can’t Do It Alone, Can You Help Me? “Why the House is Collapsing Around Us”

Theme: 

“No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main… any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.” — John Donne, Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions, 1624

Four hundred years ago, a poet lying on what he believed was his deathbed understood something that our entire modern civilization has forgotten. John Donne looked out at the world from his sickroom and saw the truth: no one is an island. No one was ever meant to be. Interdependence—the harmonizing of positive energies between human beings—overcomes obstacles, many obstacles, that no individual could ever overcome alone. What do I mean? Take a look at one of the major underlying causes of so many of our problems today.

We have built an entire society on the myth of the solitary hero. And I use the word myth deliberately, because when you peel back the layers and look honestly at what our society is made of, you find it is made of myths, illusions, lies, deception, and manipulation. That is the architecture. That is the foundation. And until we see it clearly, we will keep wondering why the house is collapsing around us.

The Gospel of the Self-Made Individual

You can do it. Just do it. Be all that you can be. These slogans are everywhere, and they are all about the individual. It’s your ladder to climb, and the gold ring is at the top, and if you don’t reach it, well, that’s on you. Nobody mentions that the ladder was designed by someone else, that the rungs are greased, and that the gold ring, when you finally grasp it, turns out to be painted tin.

Twenty-four centuries ago, Plato gave us the most enduring image in all of Western philosophy: the allegory of the cave. Prisoners chained in darkness, watching shadows flicker on a stone wall, believing with absolute certainty that the shadows are reality itself. They give prizes to the prisoner who can name the shadows fastest. They build entire hierarchies of status around shadow-naming. And when one prisoner breaks free, climbs into the sunlight, and comes back to tell the others that everything they believe is an illusion, they do not thank him. They want to kill him.

.

Allegory of the cave (CC BY-SA 4.0)

.SheepleThat is not an ancient story. That is this morning’s news. We are a civilization of shadow-watchers, giving each other awards for describing the illusions most eloquently—and destroying anyone who turns around and looks at the fire.

The Valedictorian’s Lament

Let me show you how the myth works on the people who believe in it most faithfully—the winners.

You’re brilliant. Look at your homework assignments, look at your scores. You’re valedictorian. You’re unique. And then that valedictorian goes off to college. Let’s say they earn a scholarship to an Ivy League school—Harvard, Yale, Princeton. They arrive, and suddenly they’re depressed. Calling home: Mom, I’ve got a problem. What’s that? Well, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of valedictorians here, 4.0 students. There are some smart kids here. How am I supposed to compete with that?

And Dad, you saved for years, and I got a scholarship to get in, and I’m watching students with four-point averages break down—some have even taken their own lives—because how do you compete against someone who is there because their father built the university a hundred-million-dollar building? And they’re not terribly bright, but they always seem to be getting As, and they never seem to do homework. How does that work?

It works because the meritocracy is one of the myths. It was never a level playing field. It is a stage set, built to look like one.

A Letter Home from Wall Street

Then our valedictorian graduates and gets the job on Wall Street, and he thinks: finally, I no longer have to compete. I can earn a good living, pay back the debt I owe, and move forward—relationships, family, friends, a home, an apartment, a co-op. Then he gets down there, and after his first week he sees there are 175,000 just like him, all of them also graduated at the top of their classes, magna cum laude, and he thinks: oh my God, this is a hundred times worse than school. Everyone is competing against everyone.

I thought if someone says come in early and leave late, I’d come in at six o’clock. There were people there at four, working the European and Far East markets. So I’m thinking, how do I get eight hours of sleep if I have to be here at five in the morning? At the end of the day, when the stockbrokers and the executives finally left their seats, they were ordering in, because they couldn’t get the exclusive tables at the packed restaurants downstairs—the ones where the senior partners hold court and have bragging rights that they can get into any restaurant in the city—and here you are, eating Chinese food out of a carton at your desk.

Mom, I don’t know how to do this. This is a rat race, and the only thing you end up with in a rat race is dead rats.

I don’t have the money to go out to restaurants, and already I find myself stressed all the time. My blood pressure is up. I’m constipated. I wake up in the middle of the night convinced I’m going to get fired because someone else is doing a better job and they’ll get promoted and I won’t. Yes, I have a decent salary—but I don’t have a decent life. I have no balance. I don’t have a relationship, because who wants to be with someone who works 18 hours a day? I haven’t been to a museum. I live in New York City and I have not seen a single one of the great places that people cross oceans to visit. I haven’t been to a nightclub. I haven’t gone dancing.

And I don’t have friends here, because these people are like great white sharks looking for a nosebleed in a swimming pool. They’re not friends—they’re competitors. They all want bragging rights about how hard they’re working and the bonus they’re getting. Everything is about the bonus. And you know what’s left out of the whole conversation, Mom? The clients. The brokers make money whether the client makes money or loses everything. I see people using cocaine in the restrooms—it’s everywhere. They tell me it’s natural energy. It isn’t. It’s addictive behavior. But then, so is the need for success. And I have no life.

A Mother’s Answer

The mother gives her son a simple answer, and it is worth more than his entire education.

Look, you’re a good kid. But maybe you should re-examine the life you’re choosing, because it’s not a life. It’s a permanent, indentured internship, sustained by the hope that one day you’ll be invited into that sacred circle of success. Until that day, you have no life. You’re going to lose your health, because you need sleep—we all need sleep. And you need relationships, healthy ones—not a partner you use as an unpaid therapist to absorb your complaints. It looks like nothing in your world is joyful or happy or healthy, and you’re expected to endure it all alone. That’s the design: winner-take-all, survival of the fittest, and all anyone down there can talk about is power, excess, and invitations to exclusive places.

It’s true—Taylor Swift just had her wedding, and a couple of the partners were invited, and the scuttlebutt around the office was about the wives spending thousands on unique designer gowns. But ask yourself: what does it say about a singer, whose visible attributes begin and end with celebrity, and a football player, that they need the whole world as spectators to their excess? We can rent Madison Square Garden for 20 or 30 million dollars and invite 20,000 of our dearest, closest friends. You don’t want that. If you go down that street—if your dream becomes an invitation to those special parties—you will discover that the people at the special parties are not special at all. You don’t want to live in that world: the massive overconsumption, the homes, the clothes, the jewelry, all because she can sing. How is that going to change anyone’s life? It isn’t. He plays football. How is that going to change anyone’s life? It doesn’t. What they contribute is ego, insecurity, and insincerity, like all those air-kissing fools in Hollywood and on Wall Street and in West Palm Beach and Washington and Chicago. Their whole life is a lie.

Your father was a playwright. He did very well. He provided you and me and your brothers and sisters with a good standard of living—but not an excessive one. We lived in the same home all those years, and we were happy. We did the things that normal people do with their lives, and we did them together. Around the dinner table at the end of a day of work, nobody complained—everybody was aspirational. Everybody wanted to do something, and you all had the guidance to pursue it in a way that didn’t corrupt you. Your father never allowed himself to think that one successful movie script entitled him—entitled us—to change our standard of living and surrender our quality of life, the life where we had time, joy, happiness, love, curiosity, creativity, and the freedom to travel and see other cultures. Had he bitten into that poisoned fruit, he would have had to sell his soul and write things he didn’t believe in for the paycheck. Do you know how many actors, how many thespians, how many people spend their lives working at something they do not like, surrounded by people who are not likable—people as selfish and conceited and limited as the work itself? Do you know that nearly half of all college graduates never read another serious book for the rest of their lives? They’re too busy trying to make it.

You grew up in a home where we already had made it, because we made quality of life our first priority—love and respect for each other, for our neighbors, for our friends. We had joy, and not because we had a new gown to show off, or jewelry to brag about, or a Lamborghini or a Ferrari in the driveway. We drove Fords and Buicks and Chevys, and we were happy. And here is the part I most want you to hear: we were happy for other people’s success. When was the last time you saw anyone genuinely happy for someone else’s success at your Ivy League university, or on Wall Street?

I never see it, Mom. Everyone is angry when someone else succeeds. If it’s a woman, they tear her down. If it’s a man, they insist he couldn’t have done it honestly—he’s not smart enough, so he must have cheated. Lying is the standard vocabulary here. So you’re telling me I have to give up everything I worked so hard for? All those sacrifices—the trips I didn’t take because I was studying, the sports and intramurals I skipped, the nights I gave up to become the perfect son and the perfect student, the one everyone said would go far in life? Mom, as far as I’ve gotten is nowhere. I’m still on the first rung, and I’m looking around, and I don’t want to compete anymore. I can see the downside from here.

Then hear me, she says. You are a human being. You are not a brand. Your father is loved and respected by his peers because he never sold out. He never joined the special, unique group that collects big paychecks for writing garbage. All of his work is still remembered with fondness. Remember the summer you took the month of August and went down to an Amish farm? You spent a month there, eating their food, living their rhythm, humbling yourself. You came back and told me it was magnificent—just being around a cow you could hug, seeing the unconditional love in an animal’s eyes. You felt at peace. So why don’t you look for where the peace is, instead of where the bigger paycheck and the bigger bonus are? The people you work with are running on negative energy, and negative energy always burns its vessel. They will all end up in the same place: without friends, because nobody wants to spend a life beside someone who can only brag about himself and obsess over what he owns—the Kardashian model of existence, human beings straining to become brands. So it’s your choice.

The Shadows on the Wall

Now, what is the lesson in all of this? Everything in that story is accurate, but notice something: we never recognize the problem until it reaches its conclusion, until there is a crisis with drama attached. Only then do we look back. The prisoners in Plato’s cave never question the shadows while the show is running. It takes a catastrophe to turn their heads.

Image source

Take the last catastrophe. It has now been more than six years since COVID began, and when we look back honestly, we think: my goodness, consider all the lies we were told. Consider the deception. The scientists, the bankers, the billionaires who bought in were handed indemnification—they could not be sued even if people died. And yet the average American, wanting to be a good citizen, lined up and said: I’ll take whatever you’re giving me; I’m sure it’s not harmful. And then, years later, they found out.

Think for a moment about what individuals accomplish when they work collectively on the dark side of their being—when the thing they build together is a deception. By my assessment, and by the accounting of the independent researchers whose work I trust, we did not have a true pandemic that justified what followed; we should never have had those vaccines rushed out, or remdesivir pushed as the protocol. But people trusted, because they did not have the resources to challenge what they were told. The few who did challenge it—a few doctors, a few scientists, a few journalists, a few activists and nurses—were attacked. All of them. They were smeared, deplatformed, destroyed. And others, lesser in character, watched and said: I don’t want to open that door and find a bulldozer coming at me from the other side. So the cave stayed quiet, and the shadow-play went on.

Consider the toll as I read the evidence: tens of millions harmed worldwide, and by the estimates I find credible, hundreds of thousands of Americans—more than 600,000—who did not have to die. We had study after study documenting myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and deaths following the injections. The PCR tests themselves—the very instrument that manufactured the emergency—produced false positives at staggering rates; the reviews I have examined suggest the great majority of positive results were wrong, which means millions were falsely diagnosed and placed on protocols that could harm or kill them. All these people trusted. And when the truth began to surface, not a single person stepped forward to take responsibility. Just like at a Wall Street firm, just like at any major corporation—everyone points the finger at someone else. When was the last time anyone in corporate America was held accountable for their sins and omissions? They pay a fee, and they move on. How fair is that?

We have truth on our side, said Anthony Fauci. No—you had power on your side, and a compliant media, and an indemnified industry, and that is not the same thing as truth. When science becomes orthodox, it ceases to be science. It stops questioning itself. It no longer challenges the improbability of what we are commanded to accept as absolute.

Absolutism is a danger. Exceptionalism is a danger. And the mind that wants to open but is afraid of the consequences whispers to itself: I’m not sure I can handle what I might see, so I’ll keep my eyes closed. But do you think anything negative stops existing because you’ve closed your eyes to it—whether it’s the warming climate, or racism, or the slaughter in Gaza? No. It is still there. Open your eyes, and suddenly there is an energy burst, because you have seen the truth—and once you have seen it and experienced it, how do you close your eyes again and pretend you didn’t? The truth is that deception exists, and it has been institutionalized, commodified, and weaponized, and now it is a utility for those who profit from it—just as, on Wall Street, there are whole industries that profit from someone else’s loss.

The Betrayal of the Good Citizen

And the lies are not confined to medicine. Look at our educational system. Look at how much we spend on the average student. Just recently it was reported that some 900 public schools in New York City are failing—failing—to educate the children inside them. Why? What are they learning? Or rather, why aren’t they learning? Look at the agendas that crowded out education itself—the ideological curricula, the identity politics—and then look at the lack of genuine support. The answer is always the same: make it bigger, make it more expensive, and somehow the child is supposed to learn. Then we discover it doesn’t work, and nobody is accountable for that either.

You went to a good school—all your schools were good—and you were told that this would deliver you into a major corporation where you would have security. To the contrary: what you found were large rewards reserved for the people willing to sacrifice their entire existence to make the people above them richer. Does that make any sense to you?

And this pattern is old. Look back at the 1970s and early 1980s, when the Federal Reserve under Paul Volcker drove interest rates toward 22 percent, and farmers—men and women who worked seven days a week growing our food—could not make their mortgage payments and lost their land. Some of those farms had been in the same family for over a hundred years. Gone. Who tried to save them? Nobody. Who said, let’s give them a break—after all, they feed us? No one. And in the same era, corporate America discovered outsourcing, and over the following decades tens of millions of American jobs were shipped away. The company that had anchored a town for generations became nothing but a brand, purchased for pennies on the dollar, its products manufactured overseas. What about my job? I worked here 30 years. It’s gone—and I have no skills to work anywhere else. Then your city becomes the Rust Belt, and you go to the coffee shop every morning and sit with your fellow workers and talk about how you were betrayed. Has anyone ever paid the cost of betraying people for financial gain? The answer is no. And they won’t.

That is what happens when you decide to be a good citizen who plays by the rules and trusts everyone—when you hand over your power at the ballot box and your power in the marketplace and never stop, turn around, and ask: what are the consequences? Because if we looked ahead before we committed ourselves, we would see that the consequences of these arrangements are always against us. Never for us.

What the Grandfathers Knew

Now let me take a step back, because there is another inheritance, and I received it from my grandfather. He told me this: in the 1930s, people worked together. There were no social safety nets to catch the homeless and the jobless. Men traveled as so-called hobos on freight trains around the country, hoping the next stop would offer some work so they could send a little money home. More often than not the work wasn’t there—until Roosevelt created the national programs that gave them something to build. But here is what my grandfather wanted me to understand: they worked together. They formed collectives. Hundreds of people, all unemployed, all with skills, would gather up what others threw away—a broken radio, a broken lamp—and together they would fix them, and sell them, and share what came in. It was the we. It was the interconnectivity of people who understood how important connecting and harmonizing with other human beings is to society and to life itself.

You, my son, grew up in a different generation—the generation of the me. Don’t leave anything on the table. Survival of the fittest. Look at the brutality we now celebrate in our sports, where we expect even a basketball game to look like a hockey brawl. Since when was that athleticism? Look at the superstar athletes making millions, and the entourage of strangers that instantly materializes on their arms. People too young and too unformed to make proper decisions, told that as long as someone is putting a check in their hand, it’s all about me, not we. And notice: the superstar who will not play as part of the team usually watches the team fail even as his own numbers soar. The me wins the statistics and loses the season.

Civilizations That Learned the Secret

Here is what they never teach that valedictorian in all his years of schooling: throughout history, whole civilizations have existed peacefully and honorably—and thrived—because they learned the importance of the we.

Go down to the Valley of Mexico, to the ruins of Teotihuacan, once one of the largest cities on the face of the earth. More than one hundred thousand people lived there. And when the archaeologists dug, they found something that confounded them: no palaces. No throne rooms. No monuments carved with the boasts of kings. Instead they found block after block of spacious, well-built apartment compounds—quality housing, plastered and painted, for ordinary families. A city of a hundred thousand that apparently did not believe anyone needed to have more than everyone else in order to have joy and happiness in life. We never hear about that. We are taught to look for the civilizations that left pyramids to tyrants and palaces to god-kings, as if grandiosity were the measure of greatness. But that is not what defines a civilization. Living and working in harmony, with quality of life and joy for everyone—that is worth studying.

And Teotihuacan was not alone. Five thousand years ago, in the Indus Valley, the cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-daro flourished for centuries—meticulously planned streets, covered drains, wells, and baths available not just to an elite but to ordinary households. Archaeologists found no grand palaces there either, no colossal royal tombs, and remarkably little evidence of warfare. A great civilization, prosperous and long-lived, that appears to have poured its wealth into the shared life of its people rather than into the vanity of its rulers. Go back further still, nine thousand years, to Çatalhöyük in Anatolia—thousands of people living in houses so equal in size and furnishing that scholars struggle to find the chief, because there may not have been one. And on this continent, the Haudenosaunee—the Iroquois Confederacy—bound five, then six, nations together under the Great Law of Peace, deliberating in councils that asked how each decision would fall upon the seventh generation to come. Their confederacy so impressed the colonists that echoes of it appear in the American founders’ own debates about union. In southern Africa, this wisdom has a name that survives to this day: ubuntu—I am because we are. A person is a person through other persons.

Now set beside those civilizations the monuments of the me, and listen to the poet Shelley:

“My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!”

Nothing beside remains. Round the decay

Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare

The lone and level sands stretch far away.

That is the final audit of every empire of ego: a shattered statue and a boast that the desert swallowed. The pharaohs built pyramids with the whip; the quiet cities built water systems for their neighbors. Guess whose achievement still instructs us in how to live.

I saw the living remnant of this older wisdom myself. In India they have farmers’ markets so vast that if you took the largest markets of Dallas, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington and put them together, they would be dwarfed by a single Indian market. Two or three hundred small vendors setting out their wares—twenty of them offering different curries alone, others with grains and pulses and legumes, cashews of a size you have never seen in the United States, exotic fruits and vegetables in pyramids of color. And they were at peace. They were poor, but they were at peace, because they had family, they had connectivity, and it was strong. You would take your potatoes to your neighbor: how many potatoes do you need? A bushel. And how many lentils do you need? Enough for two days, for my family. And they would exchange it—fair exchange, I give you this and you give me that. And this was generational. For hundreds of years this sharing went on.

Then along came the Green Revolution and destroyed it. You don’t need 200 different vendors, they said. We’ll take your land, give you one engineered strain of rice, sell you the pesticides and the machinery that go with it, and you won’t have to grow anything else. And suddenly the diversity was gone, the exchange was gone, the independence was gone—and the economy and health of millions of small farmers were sacrificed for the benefit of a handful of corporations. People who had fed each other for centuries now frequently went hungry.

It was the same lesson in every village that ever worked: people excelled in more than one thing, and each person shared the gift of what they had mastered. The baker had someone in before dawn so there would be fresh bread for the town. The one who understood the apothecary’s art went looking for the right herbs and seasonings and spices when a neighbor fell sick. You went to them—but they were your neighbors, they were your friends. Trust, built on the simple covenant: I have a talent and I will share it with you; you have a talent and you will share it with me. That covenant is what has kept civilizations together, families together, happiness and love of life together, throughout all of history.

The Orchestra and the Philosophers

Together we form an orchestra—each of us mastering a single instrument, but working together we make music none of us could make alone, especially if someone who understands how to harmonize the whole, one of our elders, stands as the conductor. That is a metaphor, but the greatest philosophers meant it literally. Seneca, the Stoic, wrote that all that you behold is one—we are the parts of one great body, and Nature made us kin. Marcus Aurelius, an emperor with more power than any Wall Street partner will ever hold, reminded himself daily: what is not good for the hive is not good for the bee. Aristotle taught that the human being is by nature a social animal, and that the one who lives outside the common life is either a beast or a god. Socrates and Plato spent their lives in dialogue—in dialogue, mind you, not in monologue—because they knew truth itself is something we can only approach together. The ancients knew the importance of the we. They knew the importance of the intergenerational exchange of energy and wisdom.

Right now, son, you are in a place where you cannot integrate your values, because your values are not compatible with the values of the people around you. If they are interested only in making as much money as they can, seizing the biggest bonus they can, sacrificing as much of their lives as they can to the company, then that environment will seep into you—epigenetically, energetically, it will adversely affect you. They are not aware of it in the moment, but their karma will come, because you pay a price for every wrong decision in life. You just don’t know when you will pay it, or to what degree it will manifest. But we do know what happens when people empty their lives of their toxic energies—toxic people, toxic environments, toxic work—and start over, asking: what do I want my life to be? Even at an older age: what do I want from this moment forward, and what tools do I need?

That means stopping at the inflection point. Going to a quiet place and asking yourself: the tools I was given granted me certain talents, but I am not sure I want to spend them this way. My heart told me I should do A, but my family and my peers told me I should do B. So I became a good son and a good citizen—but I never became good to my own desires, my own needs, my own ambitions and sense of meaning. That is the recipe for psychic stress: smiling on the outside, miserable on the inside. And it matters enormously what environment you work in, what people surround you, what compromises they have normalized—especially when they stand above you as policymakers and opinion leaders, and you are expected to go along.

Bottom Up, Not Top Down

If you really want to solve problems, you cannot solve them from the top down. You have to solve them from the bottom up. The simple reality is that no one on Wall Street is going to change. No one in any governmental agency is going to change. No one is going to reform the bureaucracy and the technocracy that run the scientific community, the medical community, the financial community, the energy community, the food and agriculture community. Nothing at the top is going to change unless something cataclysmic forces it, and cataclysms are rare. The people inside those institutions will keep being rewarded simply for belonging to a system that is, in and of itself, palpably—almost indescribably—negative. They will keep announcing that they have truth on their side, and as long as the rewards keep flowing, everyone inside will nod along: yes, yes, I’m a part of that.

The poet Yeats saw where this leads a century ago: things fall apart; the centre cannot hold. The centre cannot hold because the centre is hollow—it is made of the myths, the illusions, the lies, the deception, and the manipulation we have been examining all along. These institutions have to collapse under the weight of their own hubris and corruption, and in part they already are. The question—the only question that matters—is what takes their place. And that is where the optimism for the future lives.

So work together, in small groups. Work on a project that excites you, that gives you meaning. Work so that we can make changes at the personal level, the community level, because we are not going to make good changes at the corporate level, the government level, or the media level—those are too far captured. Think about what is coming: artificial intelligence, automation, downsizing. When those waves break, the people at the top will not suffer. They never do. We will. Which is exactly why the most important thing we can do at this time, amid the failure of all these institutions, is to stop facing the future alone.

The We Counts

The American civilization is only 250 years old, and it is collapsing in part—the institutions hollowed out, the trust squandered, the good citizens betrayed one lie at a time. And people look at all of it and say: what can I do? I’m just one person.

I’m saying: stop being one person. We were never meant to be one person. Walt Whitman, our own great poet of democracy, opened his masterpiece with a line our age has forgotten how to read: “For every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you.” That is not sentiment. That is the operating manual of every civilization that ever thrived—the quiet city in the Valley of Mexico, the water-carriers of the Indus, the longhouse councils of the Haudenosaunee, the market villages of India, the collectives of the 1930s, the family around the playwright’s dinner table. They all knew what the shadow-watchers in the cave do not: that no one is an island, that the bell tolls for all of us, and that the only wealth that has ever endured is the wealth we create together.

We were meant to work together. The we counts. The me is only a supporter of the we.

from:    https://www.globalresearch.ca/i-cant-do-it-alone-can-you-help-me/5932953

2026 Mercury Retrograde, Y’All

Mercury Retrograde Survival Guide: June 29th – July 23rd, 2026

Slow down, check twice, lead with compassion.

horoscope
Photo: Adobe Stock

Three or four times a year, Mercury appears to move backward in the sky from our perspective on Earth. Mercury retrograde has earned a reputation as astrology’s cosmic trickster, the courier of late news and ruler of mishaps. During these one-month periods, the areas Mercury governs – communication, reasoning, transportation, technology, paperwork, and the law – tend to get a little scrambled.

This particular Mercury retrograde takes place in Cancer, a sign associated with capricious emotions, detailed memories, family, local community, and belonging. While Mercury typically prefers logic and efficiency, Cancer leads with intuition and feeling. Mercury in Cancer often shows up as important gut feelings, intuitive insights, and sentimental conversations. When Mercury turns retrograde, however, the focus shifts toward revisiting. Old memories resurface, creative projects return for editing, and we may find ourselves or others reaching out for closure on tender-hearted matters. Decisions, commitments, and even contracts that once felt settled will be reconsidered through a new emotional lens.

Rather than fearing mess-ups and mistakes during Mercury retrograde, consider the following tips as an invitation to slow down and review.

Your Mercury Retrograde Survival Guide

Expect delays

One of the easiest ways to work with Mercury retrograde is to expect that things may take longer than anticipated. Responses arrive late. Deliveries get postponed. Technology requires troubleshooting. Patience often becomes your greatest asset.

Double-check spelling and details

Mercury rules communication, making typos, forgotten attachments, and misunderstood messages more common during retrograde periods. Before hitting send, take a moment to reread important emails, texts, social media posts, and documents.

Reread contracts and agreements

Retrogrades are famous for overlooked details. Whether you’re signing a lease, accepting a new job, making a large purchase, or finalizing paperwork, read everything carefully. If possible, give yourself extra time to review terms and ask questions.

Book extra time for travel

Mercury also governs transportation. Traffic, delays, missed connections, GPS re-routes, and scheduling mishaps tend to become more noticeable during these cycles. Leave earlier than usual and build a little flexibility into your plans.

Be open to revising plans

Mercury retrograde isn’t always about things going wrong; it is often about discovering what needs adjustment. Plans may change because new information emerges. A canceled meeting, delayed project, or altered timeline can reveal a better path forward.

The Cancer Effect: Lead with the Heart

Because this retrograde occurs in Cancer, emotional themes are likely to be front and center.

You may hear from people from your past. Family conversations that were left unfinished could resurface. Old memories, photographs, and sentimental trinkets may suddenly feel more meaningful. There can be a strong desire to retreat, protect yourself, and spend time in spaces that feel safe and familiar.

Cancer reminds us that not every conversation is purely logical. During this retrograde, people may be speaking from their feelings rather than their facts. Sensitivity is heightened, and misunderstandings can arise when emotions go unspoken.

Before reacting, ask yourself:

What is my gut feeling?

What might the other person be feeling?

Am I responding to the present moment or to an old memory being activated?

Mercury retrograde in Cancer asks us to communicate with greater compassion, both toward others and toward ourselves.

Retrogrades Are for Reflection

Mercury retrograde is less about calamity and more about a small course correction. It encourages us to revisit, review, revise, reconnect, and reflect.

Slow down. Check twice. Leave early. Read the fine print. Give yourself and others grace when plans change. And don’t be surprised if your greatest insight comes not from pushing forward in new areas, but from tying up those loose and familiar threads that have been calling your attention back.

from:    https://localnewspasadena.com/2026/mercury-retrograde-survival-guide-june-29th-july-23rd-2026/

Speaking of Plasma Life Forms

Jay Alfred

Plasma life forms

November 12, 2007

Jay Alfred: Life-Like Qualities of Plasma: Bohm, a leading expert in twentieth century plasma physics, observed in amazement that once electrons were in plasma, they stopped behaving like individuals and started behaving as if they were a part of a larger and interconnected whole. Although the individual movements of each electron appeared to be random, vast numbers of electrons were able to produce collective effects that were surprisingly well organized and appeared to behave like a life form. The plasma constantly regenerated itself and enclosed impurities in a wall in the same way that a biological organism, like the unicellular amoeba, might encase a foreign substance in a cyst. So amazed was Bohm by these life-like qualities that he later remarked that he frequently had the impression that the electron sea was “alive” and that plasma possessed some of the traits of living things. The debate on the existence of plasma-based life forms has been going on for more than 20 years ever since some models showed that plasma can mimic the functions of a primitive cell.

Plasma cosmologist, Donald Scott, notes that “…a [plasma] double layer can act much like a membrane that divides a biological cell”. A model of plasma double layers (a structure commonly found in complex plasmas) has been used to investigate ion transport across biological cell membranes by researchers (See American Journal of Physics, May 2000, Volume 68, Issue 5, pp. 450-455). Researchers noted that “Concepts like charge neutrality, Debye length, and double layer [used in plasma physics] are very useful to explain the electrical properties of a cellular membrane”. Plasma physicist Hannes Alfvén also noted the association of double layers with cellular structure, as had Irving Langmuir before him, who coined the term “plasma” after its resemblance to living blood cells.

David Brin’s Sundiver also speculated on plasma life forms. This science fiction proposed a form of life existing within the plasma atmosphere of a star using complex self-sustaining magnetic fields. Similar types of plasmoid life have been proposed to exist in other places, such as planetary ionospheres or interstellar space. Gregory Benford had a form of plasma-based life exist in the accretion disk of a primordial black hole in his novel Eater.

Plasma Life Forms in Space
An international scientific team has discovered that under the right conditions, particles of inorganic dust can become organized into helical structures which can interact with each other in ways that are usually associated with organic life. Using a computer model of molecular dynamics, V N Tsytovich and his colleagues of the Russian Academy of Science showed that particles in plasma can undergo self-organization as electric charges become separated and the plasma becomes polarized in their paper entitled From Plasma Crystals and Helical Structures towards Inorganic Living Matter, published in the New Journal of Physics in August 2007.

Past studies, subject to Earth’s gravity, have shown that if enough particles are injected into a low-temperature plasma, they will spontaneously organize into crystal-like structures or “plasma crystals”. Tsytovich’s computer simulations suggest that in the gravity-free environment of space, the plasma particles will bead together to form string-like filaments which will then twist into helical strands resembling DNA that are electrically charged and are attracted to each other.

The helical structures undergo changes that are normally associated with biological molecules, such as DNA and proteins, say the researchers. They can, for instance, divide to form copies of the original structure; which then interact to induce changes in their neighbors that evolve into other new structures. The less stable structures break down over time leaving behind only the structures that are most adapted to the environment. “These complex, self-organized plasma structures exhibit all the necessary properties to qualify them as candidates for inorganic living matter”, says Tsytovich, “they are autonomous, they reproduce and they evolve”.

He adds that the ionized conditions needed to form these helical structures are common in outer space. If that is so, then it will mean that plasma life forms are the most common life form in the universe, given that plasma makes up more than 99% of our universe which is almost everywhere ionized. This is in stark contrast to carbon-based life forms, which according to the Rare Earth hypothesis proposed by Peter Ward and Donald Brownlee, would be rare in the universe due to a number of factors – including the need for an acceptable range of temperatures to survive.

Plasma, on the other hand, is associated with high temperatures. Plasma life forms would be much more adapted to environments which would be considered hostile to carbon-based life forms. It is possible that plasma life forms were already present in the gas and materials that formed the Earth 4.6 billion years ago. Carbon-based biomolecular life forms only appeared 1 billion years later. Tsytovich and other scientists (including Lozneanu and Sanduloviciu, discussed below) have proposed that plasma life forms, in fact, spurred development of organic carbon-based life on Earth.

In this connection, Tsytovich pointed out that plasma life forms can develop under more down to Earth conditions such as at the point of a lightning strike. The researchers hint that perhaps a plasma form of life emerged on the primordial Earth which had a highly ionized atmosphere, which then acted as the template for the more familiar organic molecules we know today. A plasma bubble could form at the end of a lightning strike and act as a mould for chemicals to conform with to form a primitive biological cell.

Plasma Life Forms in the Laboratory
This is not the first time in recent years that plasma life forms have been studied. In 2003 physicists; Erzilia Lozneanu and Mircea Sanduloviciu of Cuza University, Romania, described in their research paper Minimal Cell System created in Laboratory by Self-Organization (published in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, volume 18, page 335), how they created plasma spheres in the laboratory that can grow, replicate and communicate – fulfilling most of the traditional requirements for biological cells. They are convinced that these plasma spheres offer a radically new explanation of how life began and proposed that they were precursors to biological evolution.

The researchers studied environmental conditions similar to those that existed on the Earth before life began, when the planet was enveloped in electric storms that caused ionized gases to form in the atmosphere. They inserted two electrodes into a chamber containing a low-temperature polarized plasma of argon – a gas in which some of the atoms have been split into negatively-charged electrons and positively-charged ions. They applied a high voltage to the electrodes, producing an arc of energy that bolted across the gap between them, like a miniature lightning strike. Sanduloviciu says this electric spark caused a high concentration of ions and electrons to accumulate at the positively charged electrode, which spontaneously formed spheres.

Each sphere had a boundary made up of two layers – an outer layer of negatively charged electrons and an inner layer of positively charged ions. Trapped inside the boundary was an inner nucleus of gas atoms – which was surrounded by a luminous sheet. An electric field was present between the boundary and nucleus, within which electrons are accelerated. The evolved sphere appears as a stable, self-confined, layered, luminous and nearly spherical body – much like the “orbs” described in the paranormal literature and discussed below. The amount of energy in the initial spark governed their size and lifespan. Sanduloviciu grew spheres from a few micrometers up to three centimeters in diameter.

Lozneanu and Sanduloviciu describe a rhythmic “inhalation” of the nucleus which mimics the breathing process of living systems and results in pulsations. The spheres could replicate by splitting into two. Under the right conditions they grew bigger, taking up neutral argon atoms and splitting them into ions and electrons to replenish their boundary layers. Finally, they could communicate information by emitting electromagnetic energy, making the atoms within other spheres vibrate at a particular frequency. “This is no different from the vibrating diaphragm in a telephone which enables information to be communicated from one point to another,” says David Cohen, reporting in the journal New Scientist. This would give these plasma spheres an ability which would be described as telepathic if we did not know how electromagnetic waves worked. Sanduloviciu insists that although the spheres require high temperature to form, they can survive at lower temperatures. “That would be the sort of environment in which normal biochemical interactions occur”.
According to Sanduloviciu, these plasma spheres were the first cells on Earth, arising within electric storms, and he believes that the emergence of such spheres is a prerequisite for the evolution of biological cells. He says that the cell-like spheres could be at the origin of other forms of life we have not yet considered. “There could be life out there, but not as we know it” he says. Indeed, according to plasma metaphysics, the microscopic orbs (described in the paranormal literature) and the macroscopic subtle bodies (described in the metaphysical literature) are plasma-based life forms.

Plasma Orbs in Paranormal Literature
In 2004 (as reported in the Physical News Update by Phil Schewe and Ben Stein) an experiment was conducted where particles in a plasma crystal arranged themselves into neat concentric shells (or rings – from a two-dimensional perspective), to a total ball diameter of several millimeters. These orderly Coulomb balls, consisting of aligned, concentric shells of dust particles, survived for long periods. This structure was described as an “onion-like architecture”. (Dark matter halos around galaxies also have similar structures.)

Paranormal analyst, Allan Danelek (in his book The Case for Ghosts) says, “One could think of orbs as ‘tiny ghosts’ moving around a room, their essence being contained within a tiny sphere of pure energy, like air inside a bubble.” This description matches the description of life-like pulsating plasma spheres generated in the laboratory by Lozneanu and Sanduloviciu. According to the paranormal literature “orbs” are light anomalies that appear on photographs and video as spherical balls of light but as flashes of light to the naked eye because of their rapid speed of motion. They exhibit intentional behavior – suggesting some consciousness or awareness of the environment.

Orbs often travel in groups or clusters i.e. they exhibit swarm behavior – also a characteristic of particles in plasma – a characteristic observed by Bohm (see above). Orbs also can dart back and forth rapidly like amoebic life-forms in a Petri dish. The balls can be transparent, translucent or in a bright solid form. These are signature features of magnetic plasma which has the natural property of being able to change its degree of opacity when internal frequencies change. Magnetic plasma would also allow orbs to change their output of light or luminosity.

Looking at these balls in close-up reveals that they possess an onion-like layered structure i.e. they have concentric shells – a signature feature of plasma crystals. Danelek says, “…’true orbs’ do not reflect light the same way a dust particle or flying insect does, but are instead generally more opaque and, in some cases, even appear to have rings within them.” Experienced ghost hunter Joshua Warren (in his excellent book How to Hunt Ghosts) says, “Often, orbs appear to have a nucleus, just like a cell. The nucleus might be surrounded by ‘bands’ – concentric circles emerging from it. In fact, it might appear like an onion that’s been chopped in half.” All these characteristics are identical to plasma crystals generated in the laboratory.

Some believe that an orb is a human soul or the life force of those that once inhabited a physical-dense body. Psychics claim to be able to communicate with them on a regular basis, and ghost hunters encounter them quite frequently in photographs and video. It is thought that they are conscious spirits that have stayed behind because they feel bound to their previous life or previous location for whatever reason – a typical characteristic of “Earth-bound” physical-etheric ghosts. According to plasma metaphysics, (genuine) orbs are plasma life forms and are identical to the physical-etheric nuclei observed by metaphysicists Charles Leadbeater and Annie Besant that are released from dying persons.
Subtle Bioplasma Bodies in the Metaphysical Literature

The Subtle Body is a Bioplasma Body

The subtle bodies described in the metaphysical literature (particularly the yoga and New Age literature) have signature features associated with plasma.

These include:
• Networks of filamentary currents (known as “nadis” or “meridians” in the metaphysical literature).
• Helical currents, aligned with the spine, which resemble helical pinches and “snakes” often found in plasma.
• Plasma vortexes (know as “chakras” in the metaphysical literature) caused by the helical movement of particles entering the bioplasma body.
• Jets or beams of collimated light that issue out from these vortexes which evidence a plasma discharge (similar to what issues out of a plasma gun).
• A magnetized plasma ovoid which surrounds and shields subtle bodies from the environment (just as the Earth is protected by the magnetosphere – a sphere composed of collisionless magnetized plasma).
• A plasma (Langmuir) sheath (know as an “auric sheath” or “auric shell” in the metaphysical literature) which encloses the ovoid.
• The ability of subtle bodies to pass through each other suggesting that they are composed of collisionless plasma.
• The ability of subtle bodies to emit light (not simply reflect them) that generate colorful halos.
• The ability of subtle bodies to change their degree of opacity – becoming transparent or translucent.
• The electrical feel of subtle bodies.
• The responsiveness of subtle bodies to electromagnetic fields.

All these features were described and documented more than 2,000 years ago, mainly in the Hindu and Chinese acupuncture literature; but also alluded to in the Buddhist and Christian scriptures and literature – long before the age of electricity and magnetism which was only sparked-off in the eighteenth century. Furthermore, the list above is not exhaustive – it is only meant to be a sample of the features of subtle bodies which unmistakably points to plasma. Details of the above observations can be found in the previous articles and books by this author.
The Spark of Life

According to plasma metaphysics, subtle bodies live in a magnetic plasma sphere (an ordinarily invisible counterpart Earth) – an environment similar to the early (physical-dense) Earth.

During in vitro fertilization the human embryo is given an electrical jolt to spark-off cell division. The purpose of this routine electrical intervention is not known. All is known is that cell division is unlikely to occur in the absence of this electrical intervention. According to plasma metaphysics (Our Invisible Bodies, 2006), this electrical spark is necessary to generate a plasma bubble which acts as a catalyst during embryogenesis. Unlike a biomolecular environment, a plasma environment allows long-range correlations, without which a 3 dimensional structure could not be projected from a 1 dimensional gene. An embryo within a human body is protected by the plasma bubble (i.e. the physical-etheric double) of the mother and inherits a bubble within this environment. (In this process, it acquires what the Qigong literature refers to as “prenatal qi”.)

Accelerated Morphogenesis of the Bioplasma Double
An embryonic bioplasma body is projected into the plasma bubble based on information in the physical-etheric double of the DNA. In fact, subtle radiation containing holographic information was observed by researchers at the Russian Academy of Science as a surprise effect during experiments when they were measuring the vibrational modes of DNA in solution using a sophisticated laser photon correlation spectrometer. According to Sue Benford, their research suggests the existence of a subtle radiation linked to physical DNA that supports the hypothesis of an intact energy field containing relevant ‘organismal information’. The Russian experiments produced different measurements when DNA was present and removed from the scattering chamber. These results were contrary to the expectations of the experimenters. After duplicating the initial experiment many times with re-calibrated equipment, the scientists were forced to accept that some new field structure existed. This embryonic bioplasma body within the plasma bubble (which contains helical currents) grows together with the physical-biomolecular body but at an accelerated rate, being aided by the long range correlations present in the plasma but absent in the biochemical field.

Morphogenesis of the Physical Biomolecular Body
There is mutual affinity between the bioplasma and physical-biomolecular bodies. In fact, the term “plasma” is derived from a Greek word meaning “to mould” and was coined by Langmuir based on his observations of the manner in which the positive column of a glow discharge tended to mould itself to the containing tube. Similarly, the bioplasma fetus wraps around the physical-biomolecular embryo while undergoing an accelerated morphogenesis (relative to the physical-biomolecular embryo). The physical-biomolecular body therefore is cued by the bioplasma body which acts an electronic matrix and a time-resolved hologram that guides its development. The bioplasma body, in turn, acts as a mould or a template body for the development of the single-celled physical-biomolecular embryo to the adult body. This has frequently been pointed out by metaphysicists, including Leadbeater, Besant and Barbara Brennan.

Complex biological evolution could not have taken place on Earth without the aid of the templates provided by subtle bioplasma bodies which interacted with biochemical fields via weak electromagnetic fields. These bioplasma bodies are composed of high energy particles and inhabit (magnetized) plasmaspheres which share the same space and gravitational field as the physical-dense Earth. The lowest energy plasmasphere has been described by metaphysicists as the physical-etheric Earth.

Conclusion
As proposed by Tsytovich, Lozneanu and Sanduloviciu, the physical-dense plasma cell was a precursor to the biological cell in the early (physical-dense) Earth – acting as a template or mould for the biological cell to form in 3 dimensional space. However, the lightning strikes that generated the physical-dense plasma cells also generated physical-etheric plasma cells in the physical-etheric Earth. As the conditions on Earth changed and the environment became progressively less ionized, the physical-dense plasma cell was less frequently generated. However, the physical-etheric plasma cell (existing in the physical-etheric Earth) remained as it participated in the development of the biological body to which it was attached to and subsequently was transmitted together with the biological cells in various forms of reproduction – both asexual and sexual.
Copyright © Jay Alfred 2007

Jay Alfred is the author of three books on a new field called “plasma metaphysics”. The books include Our Invisible Bodies, Brains and Realities and Between the Moon and Earth. Plasma metaphysics is the application of plasma physics and supersymmetry to the study of our high energy subtle bodies and their corresponding environments. These bodies include the “bioplasma” bodies and “astral” bodies found in the metaphysical literature. Plasma metaphysics provides an internally consistent framework for the study of these bodies against the backdrop of modern physics. The books are available at Amazon online bookstores. Visit the Plasma Metaphysics Blog.

from:    https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/column.php?id=111062

Zuckerberg (Suckerberg) Thinks Highly of His Users

Facebook founder called trusting users dumb f*cks

Peace Prize for Mr Zuckerberg?

Published 

Loveable Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg called his first few thousand users “dumb fucks” for trusting him with their data, published IM transcripts show. Facebook hasn’t disputed the authenticity of the transcript.

Zuckerberg was chatting with an unnamed friend, apparently in early 2004. Business Insider, which has a series of quite juicy anecdotes about Facebook’s early days, takes the credit for this one.

The exchange apparently ran like this:

Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

Zuck: Just ask.

Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

[Redacted Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?

Zuck: People just submitted it.

Zuck: I don’t know why.

Zuck: They “trust me”

Zuck: Dumb fucks

The founder was then 19, and he may have been joking. But humour tells you a lot. Some might say that this exchange shows Zuckerberg was not particularly aware of the trust issue in all its depth and complexity.

Facebook is currently in the spotlight for its relentlessly increasing exposure of data its users assumed was private. This is nicely illustrated in the interactive graphic you can find here or by clicking the piccie to the right.

In turn, its fall from grace has made backers of the ‘social media’ bubble quite nervous. Many new white collar nonjobs created since the mid-Noughties depend on the commercial value of your output, and personal information. (Both are invariably donated for free).

But there’s a problem.

Much of the data created by Web2.0rrhea is turning out to be quite useless for advertisers – or anyone else. Marketeers are having a harder time justifying the expenditure in sifting through the Web 2.0 septic tank for the odd useful nugget of information.

Facebook’s data stash is regarded as something quite special. It’s authenticated against a real person, and the users tend to be over 35 and middle class – the ideal demographic for selling high value goods and services. In addition, users have so far been ‘sticky’ to Facebook, something quite exceptional since social networks fall out of fashion (Friends Reunited, Friendster) as quickly as they attract users.

Facebook also has something else going for it – ordinary users regard it as the natural upgrade to Hotmail. In fact, once the crap has been peeled away, there may not be much more to Facebook than the Yahoo! or Hotmail Address Book with knobs on: the contact book is nicely integrated, uploading photos to share easier, while everything else is gravy. Unlike tech-savvy users, many people remain loyal to these for years. ®

from:    https://www.theregister.com/offbeat/2010/05/14/facebook-founder-called-trusting-users-dumb-fcks/294365

(And this was 2010, so how bad is it now? You be the judge…)

Missed Your Jabs? Here Is Another Chance.

CDC Awards Pfizer $1.24 Billion for Updated Covid Vaccines

Andrei Vaslilev/iStock/Getty Images Plus

CDC Awards Pfizer $1.24 Billion for Updated Covid Vaccines

For many in the MAHA movement, it is another blow. They hoped President Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Health and Human Services Department (HHS) would confront the devastating carnage of Covid vaccine policy.

Instead, the federal government has just awarded Pfizer new Covid vaccine contracts worth about $1.24 billion.

The contracts cover pediatric and adult doses for fiscal years 2026 and 2027. According to federal procurement records, the pediatric contract carries a ceiling of $735,720,598. The adult contract is valued at about $505.3 million.

The awards come as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to approve updated boosters, while the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shifted to a vague “individual-based decision-making” standard for many Americans, without anything close to full informed consent. They also come even though public demand has collapsed for shots associated with some of the gravest harms such as cancer, myocarditis and premature death.

Including these two Covid vaccine contracts, public listings show the Trump administration has awarded the infamous corporation about $7.34 billion in federal contract capacity since March 23, 2025.

Low Demand

The CDC awarded the contracts through its Office of Acquisition Services. The hefty size of these awards raises the most basic procurement question: Who is this product for?

CDC’s own numbers show a market the public has largely abandoned.

As of May 9, 2026, only 9.7 percent of children had been reported as being up to date with the 2025-2026 Covid vaccine. Only 3.0 percent of children had a parent who said they definitely planned to get the child vaccinated.

The adult numbers are not much better.

Even older Americans, the group federal officials say receives the greatest “benefit” from the shots, are not rushing to take them. As of March 28, only 22.6 percent of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 65 and older had been vaccinated.

The same pattern holds among pregnant women, another group federal officials routinely classify as “at risk.” As of May 9, only 11.1 percent of pregnant women had gotten the booster. Put differently, nearly nine in ten expectant mothers — thankfully! — have declined it.

The agency’s commercial claims data also showed about 20.82 million adult doses administered in retail pharmacies, and about 2.47 million in physicians’ offices, as of April 25.

At CDC’s listed Pfizer prices, the $1.24 billion award would cover roughly 13.6 million to 18 million doses. That figure does not prove the government expects demand to rebound. It proves something more revealing. Even after the public walked away, Washington is still underwriting a large Pfizer Covid vaccine market.

It did the same last season. CDC’s archived 2024-2025 vaccine price list shows separate Pfizer contract vehicles for adult and pediatric Covid vaccines, with adult Comirnaty listed at $69.44 per dose and pediatric Pfizer formulas priced between $48.88 and $99.71 per dose. The 2026-2027 awards do not break from that model, they extend it.

The Pediatric Question

The pediatric award is the most explosive part.

Brian Hooker, chief scientific officer at Children’s Health Defense (CHD), a nonprofit founded by Kennedy, put the objection bluntly. He called it “$1.24 billion for what is essentially a cold in minor children.”

At the same time, the risks are enormous. Federal regulators have long known that mRNA Covid vaccines carry an elevated risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, especially in young males. The FDA added myocarditis and pericarditis warnings to Pfizer and Moderna vaccine fact sheets in June 2021. In 2025, the agency required another labeling update, saying the observed risk was highest in males ages 12 through 24. Notably, one recent major study found myocarditis and pericarditis only among vaccinated children, with zero cases recorded among the unvaccinated.

Nor is Washington’s approach universal. For example, early on into the rollout, several Nordic countries moved away from broad Covid vaccination for healthy children and young people.

Florida broke with the policy as well. In 2022, it became the first state to recommend against Covid mRNA vaccination for healthy children. In 2024, the state went further and advised against mRNA Covid vaccines for all populations.

This magazine has extensively documented links between mRNA shots and a range of serious, often irreversible side effects. Those include neurological and immunological damage, menstrual and other reproductive abnormalities, cancer, and premature death. Federal health agencies dispute broad causal claims in those categories. But to this day, they have not produced the kind of transparent, public accounting that would settle the issue for families who were harmed.

Obviously, the new Pfizer contracts do not answer those questions. They simply move past them.

The ACIP Problem

There are also legal and procedural questions.

The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) plays a central role in vaccine recommendations. Its decisions affect federal programs, insurance coverage, and the Vaccines for Children (VCP) program.

Kennedy moved to reshape ACIP. However, a federal judge later blocked many of his appointments and stayed the votes taken by the reconstituted panel, finding that Kennedy’s overhaul likely violated federal law.

That dispute now hangs over federal vaccine policy.

Dr. Robert Malone questioned whether the CDC can properly use vaccine program funds for these purchases without valid ACIP authorization.

“Use of VFC funds requires ACIP authorization,” Malone told CHD. “But there is no ACIP.”

That claim will likely face pushback. Federal agencies often argue that existing schedules, prior recommendations, and procurement authority allow them to maintain supply.

Still, the question is not trivial. If ACIP is frozen, compromised, or legally disputed, then the public deserves clarity before another billion dollars flow to Pfizer.

The Emergency That Never Ends

The contracts also sit beside a larger shield.

The federal Covid public health emergency ended in 2023. But the liability regime under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, known as the PREP Act, did not end with it.

In December 2024, then-outgoing HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra extended the Covid PREP Act declaration through December 31, 2029. It preserved liability protections for manufacturers, distributors, program planners, pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and other qualified persons involved in covered Covid countermeasures.

That is why the new contracts matter so much.

The government is not merely buying a product. It is buying that product inside a special legal structure that limits ordinary routes of accountability for injuries caused by it.

Kennedy has had time and authority to end that injustice. He knows exactly what it is. In 2023, he described the PREP Act as a shield that allows pharmaceutical companies “to get away with mass murder.”

And yet, now in power, Kennedy has failed to act.

The episode is another reminder that the federal government has no constitutional authority to manage healthcare. As this magazine has long argued, that power must be returned to the states, local communities, and families forced to live with the consequences.

from:    https://thenewamerican.com/us/healthcare/cdc-awards-pfizer-1-24-billion-for-updated-covid-vaccines/

A Little Dialogue on Peter Thiel’s Dialog

Report: Inside Peter Thiel’s Private Club, Where Oligarchy Builds the Future

AP Images
Peter Thiel

Report: Inside Peter Thiel’s Private Club, Where Oligarchy Builds the Future

A leak from Peter Thiel’s private Dialog society offers a rare look at how America’s political, military, financial, and technology elites gather when they believe the public is not watching.

The result is not just embarrassing. It is revealing.

According to records reviewed by WIRED, Dialog is a private, invitation-only organization co-founded in 2006 by Thiel. Per the report:

It convenes US officials, foreign government figures, and Silicon Valley executives at off-the-record annual retreats. Dialog has spent two decades declining to disclose its members.

Now, internal records exposed online show who was invited, what they discussed, and what kind of world this circle is imagining.

Thiel is a co-founder of Palantir, the data-mining and surveillance company seeded by the CIA’s venture arm and now deeply embedded in government contracting across multiple administrations. He is also one of President Donald Trump’s most important Silicon Valley patrons and a Republican megadonor. And his name has surfaced in the Jeffrey Epstein orbit, with records and reporting describing meetings, correspondence, and Epstein’s own references to Thiel as a “great friend.”

Notably, WIRED also pointed to a Dialog connection in the Epstein files. In 2012, according to Department of Justice records, Harvard physicist Lisa Randall forwarded Epstein an invitation to a Dialog retreat and asked whether it was “worthwhile” to attend.

In that invite, the club’s ambitions were spelled out clearly: They wanted to “change the world.” The invitation says it brings together only a limited number of participants of “global” and “emerging” leaders “who can help implement the plans we develop.”

The Attendees

The leak shows Dialog as more than a networking retreat. It is a private forum that brings together power brokers from government, finance, technology, intelligence, surveillance, and politics.

As WIRED put it, “the documents show an extraordinary convergence of power.” It continues:

The registration records list General Alexus Grynkewich, NATO’s supreme allied commander of Europe and the head of U.S. European Command…. The website directory names sitting Trump administration officials, two U.S. senators, six members of the Paypal Mafia, a former Middle East chief of intelligence, and a sitting ambassador to the United States, along with the founders and directors of many of the country’s largest surveillance, data-broker, and advertising-data companies.

The report further points to prominent decision-makers in public finance and commerce. Among the attendees are

Treasury secretary Scott Bessent, whose department writes the rules on financial data, and Senator Ted Cruz, chairman of the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, which oversees the Federal Trade Commission and its data-privacy authority.

There are others:

Randy Kroszner, a former governor of the Federal Reserve who now serves on the Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee; Hallie Hoffman, a former general counsel and acting chief of staff of the Drug Enforcement Administration; Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League; Peter Goettler, the president of the Cato Institute; Ryan Stowers, the executive director of the Charles Koch Foundation; and Roger Myerson, a Nobel laureate economist at the University of Chicago.

In other words, “just” an intimate private retreat where the people who write the rules meet the people who profit from them. As they say, “nothing to see here.”

The Names

Beyond the names already mentioned, the roster includes others who need little introduction:

  • Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.)
  • Peter Goettler, president of the Cato Institute
  • Jonathan Greenblatt, chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)
  • Representative Jim Himes (D-Conn.)
  • Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and Middle East envoy
  • Tom Lue, general counsel and head of governance at Google DeepMind
  • Souad Mekhennet, former Washington Post reporter
  • Wes Moore, governor of Maryland
  • Neal Mohan, CEO of YouTube
  • Jared Polis, governor of Colorado
  • Rick Warren, evangelical pastor
  • Ezra Klein, political commentator

The oligarchic class is well represented. The leak names the following billionaires (and one trillionaire):

  • John Arnold, Centaurus Advisors and Arnold Ventures; $2.8 billion
  • Nicolas Berggruen, Berggruen Holdings and Berggruen Institute; $2.9 billion
  • Mike Cannon-Brookes, Atlassian; $7.7 billion
  • Scott Cook, Intuit; $4.4 billion
  • Marcos Galperin, MercadoLibre; $6.8 billion
  • Reid Hoffman, LinkedIn and Greylock Partners; $2.7 billion
  • Henry Kravis, KKR; $12.2 billion
  • Joe Lonsdale, Palantir, 8VC, and OpenGov; estimated $2.8 billion
  • Elon Musk, Tesla, SpaceX, X, and xAI; $1.3 trillion
  • Eric Schmidt, Google and Schmidt Futures; $40.1 billion
  • Barry Sternlicht, Starwood Capital Group; $3.1 billion
  • Peter Thiel, Palantir, Founders Fund, and PayPal; $27.8 billion

“Off-the-record”

WIRED reported that the leaked materials include a registration list for Dialog’s 2026 retreat near Dublin, Ireland. The list names 222 registrants. Some are marked as “active member” or “guest.” Others are first-time attendees. Many appear to have registered with personal or corporate emails rather than government accounts.

That detail is not minor. If public officials attend sensitive gatherings through private channels, their participation can fall outside the normal paper trail of government accountability. The issue is not whether every conversation is improper. The issue is that the public cannot know what its “public servants” are discussing with the wealthy industries they oversee.

Dialog’s structure appears designed for precisely that kind of discretion. One internal moderator guide reportedly tells participants that everything is “off-the-record.” It also urges comments to be concise and “nonobvious.” That raises the obvious question: If senators, generals, government officials, investors, and executives are discussing matters that could shape the public’s future, why is the public the one party not allowed in the room?

The Agenda

The retreat agenda is striking because it includes sessions that sound almost like parody. Per the report:

The program of off-the-record sessions includes “Money (Does?) Buy Happiness,” “Bring Back Nuclear,” “Navigating WWIII,” “Battlefield Technologies,” and “How’s Your Sex Life?” Other talks include “Build-a-Cult,” moderated by the founder of the Christian networking site Pray.com, and “Build-a-Party,” run by a former White House national security official.

Those titles matter because they show the worldview of the gathering. This is not a civic conference about ordinary public problems. It is a private space where powerful people appear to discuss war, technology, sex, religion, political organization, and social control in the same breath.

The “Build-a-Cult” session is especially striking. America’s Founders built a constitutional system around distrust of concentrated power, personal rule, and political worship. They would have recognized the danger immediately. Ordinarily, the word “cult” is a glaring warning. In this setting, it appears as a workshop topic, particularly chilling against the backdrop of the Trump administration’s controversial blurring of the line between church and state, its misuse of Christian messaging and symbols in war propaganda and political communications, and its reliance on megachurch networks.

The “Battlefield Technologies” and “Navigating WWIII” sessions raise a different concern. Defense technology is no longer a narrow military subject. It is now intertwined with artificial intelligence, surveillance, drones, data systems, and private contractors. When senior officials and nominally private companies discuss those themes “off-the-record,” the public has reason to ask who benefits, and what it means for future conflicts.

The Data-state Nexus

The most troubling part of the report, however, is not the eccentric agenda. It is the overlap between nominally private data companies and public power.

Dialog’s chairman, Auren Hoffman, is not just a conference organizer. He is a data-industry operator and investor: the founder of SafeGraph and LiveRamp, companies tied to location data and identity resolution, and a general partner at Flex Capital, a seed-stage venture firm with a broad portfolio across the digital economy. That makes him a connector as much as an entrepreneur, someone whose network sits at the intersection of data infrastructure, venture capital, and political access.

Alongside Thiel, another Palantir co-founder, Joe Lonsdale, is also listed in the report. Lonsdale is another Trump donor. He helped fund Trump’s 2024 campaign through Elon Musk’s America PAC. He then advised the administration on “government spending and efficiency” through the now-infamous DOGE.

Buried beneath the loud political theater of long-promised government efficiency, DOGE’s true mission had been spelled out early: to “modernize government software” in line with an “AI First Agenda.” The result was not so much the exposure and cutting of government “waste, fraud and abuse” as the digitization of government itself. That is what DOGE appears to have successfully achieved.

Once that happened, the Trump administration contracted Palantir to fuse datasets on every American, potentially creating detailed profiles on every citizen.

At the same time, Palantir’s software is used across immigration enforcement, healthcare, defense, and intelligence systems.

The Tech Future

The leaked materials also show a group preoccupied with “artificial intelligence, longevity, and the near future.”

On that future, the Dialog elites are not optimistic. WIRED reports:

Asked on a sign-up form to predict what comes next, registrants returned again and again to the same theme: AI will reorder work, war, education and belief within a few years. Several foresee mass labor displacement and a swing back toward unions and government programs. Others predict an “AI winter,” domestic terrorism targeting data centers, criminal defendants choosing AI lawyers over public defenders, or religious revival provoked by the disruption.

“Societal degeneration,” one person predicted, “will continue to accelerate.”

That last phrase captures the mood. Dialog appears to be a place where elites debate societal collapse while remaining insulated from the people who would live through it. Thiel himself recently made news after “temporarily” moving his family to Buenos Aires, part of what wealth advisors now call “sovereign diversification,” a polite phrase for the billionaire search for backup jurisdictions, tax shelters, and places to ride out the crises they help create.

There is a long tradition of powerful people gathering privately to discuss the future. One example is the Bilderberg Group, hosted this year in Washington, D.C. Notably, Thiel is a member of its steering committee. But the AI era raises the stakes. A small set of companies and investors now control tools that could drastically transform labor markets, policing, warfare, education, media, and political persuasion. At the same time, those same people are finding ways to “penetrate government” itself, to borrow the infamous maxim, through lobbying, political spending, advisory roles, and the revolving door. Obviously, their private conversations with public officials should not be treated as harmless salon culture.

Republic vs. Oligarchy

The deeper irony of the Dialog leak is not that a private club failed to protect its own secrets. It is that the ultra-wealthy and well-connected people exposed in the leak are helping build a world where privacy increasingly belongs only to them.

Dialog reportedly collected political leanings, matchmaking answers, and private access tokens, then promised discretion. When the data spilled out, the lesson was obvious: The powerful value privacy when it is their own.

Everyone else is pushed into a different bargain.

It includes digital IDs, digital money, tokenized assets, biometric checkpoints, travel databases, location tracking, identity graphs, AI risk-scoring, and mass-data collection, all dressed up as convenience, safety, and modernization.

But what emerges is not a republic. A republic requires visible, accountable power and private, responsible citizens. An oligarchy reverses the order.

Dialog shows that reversal in miniature. Billionaires, data brokers, defense contractors, political donors, and public servants gather privately to “change the world.” The public is not invited into the room. It is forced to simply accept this new world and comply with its rules.

So the question is no longer whether powerful people are meeting in private. They always have. The question is whether a Republic can survive when those private clubs are building the instruments through which everyone else will be watched, measured, scored, and governed.

from:    https://thenewamerican.com/us/tech/report-inside-peter-thiels-private-club-where-oligarchy-builds-the-future/

MMR Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)

New Study Shows MMR Vaccines Linked to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)

A new study titled ‘Deaths Following MMR and MMRV Vaccination in the United States’ examined the link between vaccine-related deaths in children. The study found that most of the vaccine-related deaths occurred when the children were aged one to one and a half years, which coincides with the time that MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccines are given. MMR and MMRV vaccine deaths were 2600% higher than deaths from measles infection since 1995.

.

This study was published in February 2026, but was recently removed from the Toxicology Reports publication.  You can read the full report at this ilink:

https://zenodo.org/records/18671462

The woman in the video below tragically lost here son 40 years ago and she cried that she poisoned her baby with a vaccine that she was told was safe.

RFK, Jr. explains how drug manufacturers benefit from the vaccine “gold rush”: